摘要
詹姆逊发现,上世纪60年代的美国批评界,结构主义混淆语言与'实在'的关系,忽视了'历史'范畴。而美国左翼批评界否定意识形态,放弃了马克思主义的政治话语。因此,詹姆逊试图构建一种马克思主义阐释学。詹姆逊主张打破语言的牢笼,走向内容与形式、共时与历时的辩证批评,也就是对文本的意识形态机制进行政治阐释。詹姆逊的马克思主义阐释学,是一种基于'永远历史化'策略下的结构历史主义,与其他后现代主义理论以及其他新马克思主义理论有本质的区别。
For Frederic Jameson,in the American critical circle of the 1960 s,structuralism confused the relationship between language and being to the extent of ignoring the domain of'history'.The leftists,meanwhile,avoided ideological interpretation and discarded Marxism’s political discourse.This is why Jameson attempts to construct a Marxist hermeneutics:to break the prison-house of language and initiate a dialectic criticism that combines content with form and synchronicity with diachronicity.In other words,he aims to politically interpret the ideological mechanism of a text.Jameson’s Marxist hermeneutics is a type of structural historicism,adopting an'Always historicize.'tactic and fundamentally differing from postmodernism and other new Marxist theories.
作者
张谡
Zhang Su(School of Foreign Languages,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin,China,300134;Arts School of People’s University,Beijing,China,100872)
出处
《当代外国文学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第2期119-125,共7页
Contemporary Foreign Literature
基金
天津市哲学社会科学规划资助项目“社会形式诗学研究”(TJWW17–019)阶段性成果
关键词
詹姆逊
语言
意识形态
阐释学
结构历史主义
Frederic Jameson
language
ideology
hermeneutics
structural historicism
