摘要
目的:比较彩色多普勒超声仪和CT诊断妇科盆腔肿瘤诊断中的应用价值。方法:回顾性比较和分析住院手术的180例妇科盆腔肿瘤的彩色多普勒超声仪(彩超)和CT资料。结果:180例盆腔肿瘤CT诊断符合率为93.3%(168/180),彩色多普勒超声符合率为91.1%(164/180),两者差异无显著性(P】0.05)。对盆腔良性肿瘤和恶性肿瘤的诊断,彩色多普勒超声符合率分别为95.3%(122/128)和82.6%(43/52),CT符合率分别为97.6%(125/128)和84.6%(44/52)。其中盆腔恶性肿瘤共52例,对肿瘤临床分期,CT符合率为76.6%(43/52),彩超符合率为61.7%(29/52),CT优于彩超。结论:与CT检查比较,彩色多普勒超声仪诊断妇科盆腔肿瘤,具有简便、廉价、准确较高的特点。
Objectove:To compare the diagnosis value of color ultrasonography and computed tomography(CT)for gynecologic pelvic carcinoma.Methods:To analysis and compare the data of color ultrasonography and CT in 180 patients having gynecologic pelvic carcinoma.Results:The diagnosis positive rate of CT for 180 gynecologic pelvic carcinoma was 93.3%(168/180).The diagnosis positive rate of color ultrasonography was 91.1%.There were no significant difference(P>0.05).As the pelvic benign carcinoma and malignant carcinoma, the diagnosis positive rates of color ultrasongography were 95.3%and 82.6%,respectively the diagnosis positive rate of CT were97.6% and 84.6%,For the clinical periods in 52 cases having pelvic malignant carcinoma,the diagnosis positive rates of CT was 76%,and the diagnosis positive rate of color ultrasonography was 61.7%.CT was better than color ultrasonography.Conclusion:Compared with CT,color ultrasonography is cheaper,convenient,and accurate for diagnosis positive pelvic carcionma.
出处
《临床医药实践》
2009年第2X期90-92,共3页
Proceeding of Clinical Medicine
