摘要
激励创新、先占原则、劳动理论论证传统知识的知识产权保护难度较大,鼓励商业化、侵占、不当得利、精神权利保护则有一定的说服力,而商标侵权和商标淡化只适用于极少数案例。传统知识虽与知识产权有较大区别,但是它总体上也属于知识产权、财产,现有的财产权理论支持传统知识中性保护而不是强保护。
Applying the principle of innovation encouragement,the Preoccupation,the labor theory to explain intellectual property protection of traditional knowledge is quite difficult,while the principle of encouraging commercial,encroachment,improper profit,and spiritual rights protection can be convincing to some extent,and trademark infringement and trademark dilution are only applicable to a very small number of cases.Traditional knowledge is quite different from intellectual property,but generally speaking it belongs to the intellectual property rights,property,and the property right theory supports the neutral protection of traditional knowledge rather than a strong protection.
出处
《朝阳法律评论》
2014年第1期161-174,共14页
Chaoyang Law Review
关键词
传统知识
传统知识的知识产权化
土著人
特别权
防御性保护
Traditional Knowledge
Intellectual Property of the Traditional Knowledge
Indigenous Peoples
Special Rights
Defensive Protection
