摘要
撤销诉讼,可以说是日本行政诉讼当中,最为传统也是最具典型意义的诉讼形态。而撤销诉讼的提起,必须具备一定的"诉的利益"(原告适格、狭义的诉的利益、行政处分性)。撤销诉讼的原告适格,是指提起撤销诉讼的资格的问题。尽管现行《行政案件诉讼法》第9条第1款规定,"对请求撤销处分或裁决具有法律上的利益者",具有提起撤销诉讼的原告资格,但是,由于该法并没有明确界定何谓"法律上的利益",因此,原告适格论,实际上也就演变成为"法律上的利益"的解释论。对此,传统上存在着两种对立的观点:"法律上所保护的利益说"和"值得保护的利益说"。本文在对日本行政法学上的原告适格论做一个整体概观之后,以当今最高法院有关原告适格尤其是第三人的原告适格的典型判例为素材,梳理并详细分析了该理论的发展脉络,并对未来的发展方向做了展望。
In the Japanese legal system,an action for the revocation of an administrative disposition is one of the oldest and the most popular types of lawsuits.According to the Japanese Administration Case Litigation Act,Article 9,Section 1,usually only aperson who has legal interest to seek the revocation of the original administrative deposition can file a lawsuit for the revocation of an administrative disposition.However,in regard to the legal interest,there is no expressed definition telling us what legal interest is.Hence,when we think about plaintiff standing,we also have to consider what is the legal interest.Traditionally,there are two theories,the first being an interest that was protected by a law,and the second being an interest that worth being protected.This essay will initially provide you an overview of the Japanese plaintiff standing and explain its key features,especially third party's standing to sue through providing history and analyzing precedents made by the Japanese Supreme Court,and finally make some future predictions.
出处
《财经法学》
2016年第4期103-122,128,共21页
Law and Economy
