期刊文献+

市场竞争与商业银行风险承担——理论推导与来自中国银行业的经验证据 被引量:6

The Relationship between Banking Market Competition and Risk-Taking——Theoretical deduction and empirical evidence from China's banking system
原文传递
导出
摘要 现有理论研究普遍认为过度竞争会鼓励商业银行增加风险承担,但实证文献并未发现两者之间稳定的正向关系。现有理论模型假设商业银行仅在存款市场上竞争是导致理论和实证研究结论出现背离的重要原因。通过构建一个考虑银行在贷款市场上竞争的扩展模型,本文揭示了一种完全不同于现有理论的传导机制,即贷款市场竞争的增强使得商业银行降低贷款利率,从而相应减轻了企业贷款成本和从事冒险投资项目的动机,间接降低了商业银行的信用风险承担。基于我国115家商业银行1996-2014年的面板数据,实证检验了市场竞争与银行风险承担之间的关系。结果显示,银行业市场越垄断,商业银行的风险承担水平越高;相反,市场越竞争,商业银行的风险承担水平则越低。本文的政策含义十分明确,应进一步深化金融领域的市场经济体制改革,充分发挥市场在金融资源配置中的决定性作用。 The theoretical research generally believes that over-competition will encourage commercial banks to increase risk-taking, but the empirical literature has not found a stable positive relationship between them. The existing theoretical model assumes that commercial banks compete only in the deposit market, which is an important reason for the divergence of theoretical and empirical conclusions. By constructing an extended model considering the bank's competition in the loan market,this paper reveals a transmission mechanism which is completely different from the existing theories. That is, the enhancement of the loan market competition makes the commercial banks reduce the loan interest rate, thus reducing the enterprise loan cost and the motivation to engage in the venture investment projects, and indirectly reducing the motivation of the venture investment project. We then empirically tested the relationship between market competition and bank risk-taking Based on the panel data of 115 commercial banks in China from 1996 to 2014. The results show that the more monopolistic in the banking market, the higher the risk taking of commercial banks; on the contrary, the more competitive the market is, the lower the risk taking of the commercial banks. The policy meaning of this article is very clear. We should further deepen the reform of the market economic system in the financial field and let market play the fundamental role in the allocation of financial resources.
作者 韩雍 刘生福 Han Yong;Liu Fusheng
出处 《投资研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期34-47,共14页 Review of Investment Studies
关键词 商业银行 市场结构 存款竞争 贷款竞争 风险承担 Commercial banks Market structure Deposit competition Loan competition Risk taking
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献25

  • 1何韧.银行业市场结构、效率和绩效的相关性研究——基于上海地区银行业的考察[J].财经研究,2005,31(12):29-40. 被引量:43
  • 2Bain, J. S. , 1951, Relation of Proflt Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing 1936-1940 [J], Quarterly Journal o f Economics, 65, 293-324. 被引量:1
  • 3Demsetz, H., 1973, Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy [J], Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 1-9. 被引量:1
  • 4Berger, A. , 1995, The Profit-structure Relationship in Banking-test of Market Power and Efficient-structure Hypotheses [J], Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27 (2), 404-431. 被引量:1
  • 5Shepherd, W. , 1982, Economies of Scale and Monopoly Profits [C], in Industrial Organization, Antitrust, and Public Policy, J.V. Craven (ed.), Boston, Kulwer Nihoff. 被引量:1
  • 6Shepherd, W. , 1986, Tobin's q and the Structure-performance Relationship: Reply [J], American Economic Review, 76, 1205-10. 被引量:1
  • 7Evanoff, D. , Fortier, D. , 1988, Reevaluation of the Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm in Banking [J] , Journal of Financial Services Research, 1, 277-294. 被引量:1
  • 8Casu, B. , Girardone, C. , 2006, Bank Competition, Concentration and Efficiency in the Single European Market[J]. The Manchester School, 74, 441-468. 被引量:1
  • 9De Guevara, J. , Maudos, J. , 2007, EzplanatoryFactors of Market Power in the Banking System [J], The Manchester School, 75, 275-296. 被引量:1
  • 10Berger, A.N. and Hannan, T. H. , 1989, The Price-Concentration Relationship in Banking [J], Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 291-299. 被引量:1

共引文献35

同被引文献71

引证文献6

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部