摘要
契丹族源与木叶山方位的问题,一直以来在学术界存在着不同的看法。笔者本着实事求是的态度,结合史书记载和考古发现,对这两个问题进行考辨,提出了东胡远源、匈奴别源和鲜卑近源的说法,并以考古学的资料作为佐证,说明契丹直接源于鲜卑。木叶山的问题,随着考古资料的新发现,为寻找其具体方位提供了可靠的线索,提出新的认识。
There has been a different view in the academic circles about the origin of the Qidan nationality and the position of Mu Ye Shan. Based on the attitude of seeking truth from facts, combining historical records and archaeological discoveries, the author makes a textual analysis of these two problems, and puts forward the views of the far source of East Hu, the source of the Xiongnu and the near source of Xianbei, and the evidence of the archaeology as a proof that the Khitan is directly derived from Xianbei. With the new discoveries of archaeological data, the problem of Mu Ye Shan has provided reliable clues for finding its specific directions and put forward new ideas.
作者
张景明
马宏滨
ZHANG Jing-ming;MA Hong-bin
出处
《青海民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期115-119,共5页
Qinghai Journal of Ethnology
关键词
契丹族源
木叶山方位
考古学
考辨
Khitan Origin
Leaf Mountain Azimuth
Archaeology
Textual Research
