期刊文献+

新产程对降低产时剖宫产率及母儿结局的临床影响 被引量:2

Clinical Effect of New Production Process on Reducing the Cesarean Section Rate at Birth and Maternal and Infant Outcomes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨新产程对降低产时剖宫产率及母儿结局的临床影响。方法选取该院2014年2月—2016年2月收治的1 000名产妇作为研究对象,根据产程管理方案分为两组,各500名。分为原产程组(对照组),新产程组(观察组),比较两组对降低剖宫产率及母儿结局的影响。结果观察组中转剖宫产率(2.80%)、头盆不称剖宫产率(1.80%)、胎儿窘迫剖宫产率(1.00%)显著低于对照组8.00%、4.00%、3.40%,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=13.233,P1=0.000;χ~2=4.297,P2=0.038;χ~2=6.693,P3=0.000)。观察组产妇产后尿潴留率、产后出血率、新生儿窒息率分别为(2.40%)、(1.40%)、(0.40%),对照组的为(2.60%)、(1.60%)、(0.60%),两组差异无统计学意义(χ~2=0.041,P1=0.839;χ~2=0.068,P2=0.795;χ~2=0.201,P3=0.654)。观察组活跃期时间(60.74±2.11)min显著少于对照组(170.97±10.86)min,差异有统计学意义(t=222.797,P=0.000)。结论实施新产程使阴道试产时中转剖宫产率明显降低,但并不会增加母儿的不良影响,值得在临床进一步探讨和推广。 Objective To study the clinical effect of new production process on reducing the cesarean section rate at birth and maternal and infant outcomes. Methods 1000 cases of delivery women admitted and treated in our hospital from February 2014 to February 2016 were selected and divided into two groups with 500 cases in each according to the production process management plan, and the effect on reducing the cesarean section rate at birth and maternal and infant outcomes was compared between the two groups. Results The transit cesarean section rate, eephalopelvie disproportion cesarean section rate and fetal distress cesarean section rate in the observation group were obviously lower than those in the control group (2.80%, 1.80%, 1.00% vs 8.00%, 4.00%, 3.40%), and the differences were statistically sig- nificant (χ^2=13.233, PI=0.000; χ^2=4.297, P2=0.038;χ^2=6.693, P3=0.000), and the postpartum urinary retention rate, postpartum hemorrhage rate and neonatal asphyxia rate in the observation group and in the control group were respectively (2.40%), (1.40%), (0.40%) and (2.60%), (1.60%), (0.60%), and the differences were not obvious (χ^2=0.041, PI= 0.839; χ^2=0.068, χ^2=0.795; χ^2=0.201, P3=0.654), and the active period time in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group [(60.74±2.11)min vs (170.97± 10.86)mini, and the difference was statistically significant (t=222.797,P=0.000). Conclusion The implementation of new production process can obviously reduce the cesarean section rate during vaginal trial delivery, without increasing the adverse effect of mothers and infants, which is worth further study and promotion in clinic.
作者 李娟 LI Juan(Tongnan District Maternal and Infant Heahheare Family Planning Service Center,Chongqing,402660 China)
出处 《系统医学》 2018年第21期111-113,共3页 Systems Medicine
关键词 新产程 剖宫产 妊娠结局 New production process Cesarean section Gestational outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献62

  • 1Ghodsi Zahra. The Effect of Spinal Block for Labor Analgesi- a in Parturient in Iran [J].Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,2011,28:919-922. 被引量:1
  • 2Velho Manuela Beatriz,de Oliveira Maria Emilia,dos Santos Evanguelia Kotzias Atherino. [Reflections on nursing assis- tance provided to the parturient].[J].Revista Brasileira de En- fermagem,2010,63(4):652-659. 被引量:1
  • 3Lindgren Helena ,Brink Asa,Klinberg-Allvin Marie.Fear causes tears - Perineal injuries in home birth settings.A Swedish interview study [J].BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2011,11(1):6-13. 被引量:1
  • 4Zhang J, Troendle J, Mikolajczyk R, et al. The natural history of the normal first stage of labor[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 115 (4):705-710. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318 ld55925. 被引量:1
  • 5Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116(6):1281-1287. DOI: 10.1097/ AOG.0b013 e3181 fdef6e. 被引量:1
  • 6Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study[J}. BMJ, 2007, 335 (7628):1025. 被引量:1
  • 7Shah A, Fawole B, M' imunya JM, et al. Cesarean delivery outcomes from the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Africa[J}. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 107 (3):191-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.013. 被引量:1
  • 8Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America[J}. Lancet, 2006, 367(9525):1819-1829. 被引量:1
  • 9American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery[J}. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 210(3):179-193. DOI: 10.1016/j. ajog.2014.01.026. 被引量:1
  • 10Laughon SK, Branch DW, Beaver j, et al. Changes in labor patterns over 50 years[J}. Am J Obstet GyneCol, 2012, 206(5): 419.el-9. DOI: lO.lO16/j.ajog.2012.03.003. 被引量:1

共引文献113

同被引文献29

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部