摘要
辩护律师执业难是我国刑事司法领域的"痼疾"。近年来,国家层面的一系列举措初见成效,但并非"治本之策"。低效乏力的同体监督、息事宁人的行政协调、缺乏制裁的处理结果以及"运动式"的治理方式等无助于构建律师执业权利救济的长效机制。律师的执业权利不同于诉讼权利。执业权利侵权纠纷本质上是发生在不同法律职业群体之间的特殊纠纷,应当建立专门的执业纠纷仲裁制度。为了确保仲裁的权威性、惩戒的威慑力以及救济的便捷性,还应当推进政法委与司法行政机关合署办公,建立统一的法律职业人事管理制度,并建立律师执业纠纷解决网络平台。
The problems in the practice of defense lawyers have existed for a long time in criminal justice in China. In recent years, a series of measures taken by the national level organs have achieved initial results, but the problems have not been completely solved, such as the low supervision efficiency, conciliatory coordination, and the penalty-missing treatment. The right to practice differs from the litigation right. In essence, the dispute of practicing right infringement is a kind of special dispute among different legal professional groups. We should establish a specialized arbitration system for settling disputes. Supporting measures should be taken to ensure the authority of arbitration, the deterrent force of punishment and the convenience of relief, i.e. to co-locate judicial administrative organs with Politics and Law Committee; to establish a unified legal professional personnel management system; and to construct a network platform for lawyers practice dispute resolution.
作者
封利强
FENG Li-qiang(School of Law,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China)
出处
《浙江工商大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期61-72,共12页
Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基金
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目"刑事司法纠错机制研究"(13SFB2020)
关键词
辩护律师
执业权利
救济机制
仲裁制度
defense lawyer
right to practice
relief mechanism
arbitration system
