期刊文献+

不良组织学特征对结直肠癌肿瘤学治疗效果的影响 被引量:3

Oncological outcomes analysis of colorectal cancer with unfavorable histological features
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不良组织学特征对淋巴结阴性结直肠癌根治术治疗效果的影响。方法回顾性收集2013年1月至2015年12月北京协和医院基本外科收治并行根治性手术的结直肠癌患者资料,分析临床不良组织学特征对淋巴结阴性结直肠癌患者远期生存的影响。共入组167例患者,男性98例,女性69例。年龄(63.6±11.6)岁。观察指标包括年龄、T分期、脉管浸润、神经浸润、肿瘤种植、清扫淋巴结数目、分化程度、组织类型、环周切缘。单因素分析采用χ^2检验,多因素分析采用Cox回归模型。结果单因素分析结果显示,环周切缘阳性、肿瘤种植和年龄与无病生存率相关,环周切缘、年龄、T分期、肿瘤种植和淋巴结清扫数目与总体生存率相关(P值均〈0.05)。多因素分析结果显示,年龄≥70岁(HR=1.053,95% CI:1.013~1.095,P=0.009)、低分化腺癌(HR=7.572,95% CI:1.815~31.587,P=0.005)、肿瘤种植(HR=4.711,95% CI:1.809~12.264,P=0.002)、黏液腺癌(HR=3.063,95% CI:1.003~9.354,P=0.049)、脉管瘤栓(HR=2.885,95% CI:1.062~7.832,P=0.038)、神经侵犯(HR=6.610,95% CI:1.037~42.122,P=0.046)是无病生存率的独立不良预后因素;低分化腺癌(HR=12.200,95% CI:1.985~74.972,P=0.007)、肿瘤种植(HR=5.379,95% CI:1.636~17.685,P=0.006)、年龄≥70岁(HR=1.062,95% CI:1.013~1.114,P=0.013)和神经侵犯(HR=8.043,95% CI:1.026~63.055,P=0.047)是总体生存率的独立不良预后因素。T1~2期患者与T3~4期患者比较,3年无病生存率及3年总体生存率无明显差异(P值均〉0.05)。 结论年龄≥70岁、低分化腺癌、黏液腺癌、肿瘤种植、脉管瘤栓、神经侵犯是淋巴结阴性结直肠癌患者的独立不良预后因素。 ObjectiveTo explore the effect of unfavorable histological features on the clinical outcomes of patients receiving radical resection of colorectal cancer.MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients with colorectal cancer who received radical surgery between January 2013 and December 2015 at Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital was performed. The impact of unfavorable histological features on the oncological outcomes of patients with lymph node-negative colorectal cancer were analyzed.A total of 167 patients were enrolled, including 98 males and 69 females with age of (63.6±11.6) years. Observation indicators included age, T stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor deposits, number of lymph node dissection, degree of differentiation, tissue type, and circumferential margin. Univariate analysis was performed with χ^2 test and multivariate analysis was performed with Cox regression model.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that positive circumferential margins (CRM), tumor deposits and age were associated with disease free survival (DFS) rate; positive CRM, age, tumor deposits, and lymph nodes dissection less than 12 were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) rate (all P〈0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that over 70 years of age (HR=1.053, 95% CI: 1.013 to 1.095, P=0.009), poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (HR=7.572, 95%CI: 1.815 to 31.587, P=0.005), tumor deposits (HR=4.711, 95% CI: 1.809 to 12.264, P=0.002), mucinous adenocarcinoma (HR=3.063, 95% CI: 1.003 to 9.354, P=0.049), lymphovascular invasion (HR=2.885, 95% CI: 1.062 to 7.832, P=0.038), and nerve infiltration (HR=6.610, 95% CI: 1.037 to 42.122, P=0.046) were adverse prognostic factors of DFS rate; poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (HR=12.200, 95% CI: 1.985 to 74.972, P=0.007), tumor nodules (HR=5.379, 95% CI: 1.636 to 17.685, P=0.006), over 70 years of age (HR=1.062, 95% CI: 1.013 to 1.114, P=0.013), and perine
作者 陆君阳 徐徕 张冠南 孙曦羽 邱辉忠 吴斌 林国乐 肖毅 Lu Junyang;Xu Lai;Zhang Guannan;Sun Xiyu;Qiu Huizhong;Wu Bin;Lin Guole;Xiao Yi(Department of General Surgery,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Peking Union Medical College,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第11期843-848,共6页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
基金 首都临床特色应用研究与成果推广项目(Z161100000516014)
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 组织学 根治性手术 肿瘤学疗效 Colorectal neoplasms Histology Radical surgery Oncological efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献15

  • 1陆爱国,郑民华,冯波,李健文,胡艳艳,王明亮,胡伟国,董峰,毛志海,臧潞,蒋渝.腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术根治结肠癌[J].外科理论与实践,2004,9(6):464-466. 被引量:20
  • 2刘蔚东,张阳德,Choi Gyuseog,Lee Intaek.腹腔镜下右半结肠癌D3根治术[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(6):499-501. 被引量:21
  • 3王正康.根3式右半结肠切除术//黄莛庭.王正康.腹部外科新手术.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,1996:67-75. 被引量:5
  • 4Toyota S,Ohta H,Anazawa S.Rationale for extent of lymph node dissection for right common cancer[J].Dis Colon Rectum,1995,38 (7):705-711. 被引量:1
  • 5Fujita J,Uyama I,Sugioka A,et al.Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with radical lymph node dissection using the no-touch isolation technique for advanced colon cancer[J].Surg Today,2001,31 (1):93-96. 被引量:1
  • 6Hohenberger W,Weber K,Matzel K,et al.Standardized surgery for colonic cancer:complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome[J].Colorectal Disease,2009,11 (4):354-365. 被引量:1
  • 7Edge SB,Byrd DR,Compton CC,et al.AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.Colon and Rectum[M].Chicago:Springer,2010. 被引量:1
  • 8West NP,Kobayashi H,Takahashi K,et al.Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery:comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation[J].J Clin Oncol,2012,30 (15):1763-1769. 被引量:1
  • 9Adamina M,Manwaring ML,Park KJ,et al.Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer[J].Surg Endosc,2012,26 (10):2976-2980. 被引量:1
  • 10West NP,Morris EJ,Rotimi O,et al.Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival:a retrospective observational study[J].Lancet Oncol,2008,9 (9):857-865. 被引量:1

共引文献163

同被引文献40

引证文献3

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部