期刊文献+

税收滞纳金性质之争探因

A Probe into the Dispute Over the Nature of Late Tax Payment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于我国税收滞纳金制度没有对税收确定行为和税收缴纳行为区别对待、没有对过失性和故意性未缴少缴税款的税收确定行为区别对待,所以造成了税收滞纳金法律性质争议不断。要改革我国的税收滞纳金,首要工作不是对税收滞纳金重新定性,而是要对未缴少缴税款的不同行为分别处理。具体来说,我国税收滞纳金改革应对滞纳税款的税收缴纳行为保留税收滞纳金,对过失未缴少缴税款的税收确定行为应改收利息,对故意未缴少缴税款的行为应改征类似于日本加算税的项目。 Due to the fact that there is no difference between tax determination and tax payment in our country, there is no properclassification and discrimination on negligence and willful unpaid taxes, so the legal nature of tax delaying payment is controversial.To reform the tax arrears of our country, the first priority is not to reclassify the taxes, but to separate the actions of unpaid taxes. Inparticular, the tax payment of overdue tax in our country should be reserved for the tax payment of overdue tax, and the tax paymentfor overdue tax should be changed to the interest rate, and the tax should be changed to similar to Japan’ s value-added tax.
作者 肖翔 马艳 XIAO Xiang;MA Yan(Dentons Law Offices Suzhou Branch,Suzhou 215000,China)
出处 《经济研究导刊》 2018年第31期65-67,共3页 Economic Research Guide
关键词 税收滞纳金 税收确定行为 税收缴纳行为 征管法修订 late fees for taxes tax determination behavior tax payment behavior revision of the law of management
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献42

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部