摘要
在《大唐狄公案》这部由汉学家高罗佩所著的推理断案小说中,以《朝云观》为代表的道教故事篇章不仅多角度地呈现了丰富的道教文化,而且亦于其间隐伏了对于道教的反讽性表述。同时,《大唐狄公案》中的涉佛与涉道篇章既在佛、道形象反面化方面具有相似性,又在正邪人物设置及艺术形象人性化诠释上存在明显差异。这些有关道教的文学表述不仅承载着高罗佩对于中国传统艺术的文化想象,也反映了其对待道教文化由感性认同到理性思辨的内在认知历程,并投射出他在对以道教文化为代表的中国传统文化的传扬中所秉持的辩证精神与科学审视态度。
Robert van Gulik, the Dutch sinologist, who had written A Judge Dee Mystery that was a detective fiction, and in the works involving Taoism especially in Zhao Yun Taoist Temple, Gulik reflected Taoist culture variously, in which there was irony for Taoism. At the same time, There were similarities in characterization of criminal reversion between the works involving Buddhism and the works involving Taoism in A Judge Dee Mystery, and obvious differences in how positive and negative images were set and humanistic interpretation of characterization＇s personification. The plots about Taoism not only loaded Gulik＇s special cultural ideal on traditional arts of China, but also reflected his view development from perceptual identification to rational examination on Taoist culture and thought and reflected his dialectical thought and scientific attitude during the course of his propagating traditional culture of China based on Taoist culture, which was reflection for Gulik＇s fancy for the classical culture of China.
作者
王凡
WANG Fan(College of Literature,Shandong Normal University,Jinan 250014,China)
出处
《北京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第11期49-57,共9页
Social Sciences of Beijing
关键词
高罗佩
《大唐狄公案》
道教文化
反讽手法
佛、道异同
Robert van Gulik
A Judge Dee Mysteu
Taoist culture
irony
similarity and differences between images of Buddhism and Taoism
