摘要
TRIPs协定开宗明义写道"知识产权即私权",该宗旨目前尚未真正得到法律学界的认可,仍有观点认为知识产权是一项公权力或公权与私权混合型权利。一项权利放置于公权领域或者私权领域,将带来不同的法律效果。知识产权从封建王权脱身而来,涉及言论自由、公共福祉等利益平衡,自身已然具有极强的公权外观,如果不从更为深刻的法律理论上确认其权利性质,知识产权的私权属性将有可能被扭曲,损害知识产权人的私权利益,阻碍科技进步。从知识产权私权属性的"纵向""横向"和"深度"三个维度分析来看,知识产权的本质为民事私权。
The TRIPs agreement explicitly states that “intellectual property rights are private rights”, which has not yet been really recognized by the legal circles. There are still views that intellectual property rights are a mixed right of public power or public and private rights. A right placed in the field of public rights or private rights will bring different legal effects. Intellectual property right comes from the feudal monarchy and involves the balance of interests such as freedom of speech and public welfare. Thus, it is essential to identify the nature of intellectual property right from legal theories, avoiding the misunderstanding which may lead the harm to one’s proper rights. This thesis attempts to clear all the problems referred above by studying in three dimensions： vertical, horizontal and depth. Then we can draw a conclusion that intellectual property right is a private right from its historical origin under the analysis of western property philosophy.
作者
牛东芳
NIU Dongfang(College of Intellectual Property,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出处
《中州大学学报》
2018年第5期52-57,共6页
Journal of Zhongzhou University
关键词
知识产权
民事私权
社会系统论
法哲学原理
intellectual property rights
private rights
social system theory
philosophy of law
