摘要
1915-1923年间,围绕日本对华"二十一条"中国共发生了三次抵制日货运动。日置益在日本当局制定有关这一时期抵制日货运动因应对策的过程中充当了关键角色,其于1915年提出的"静观论"在三次运动的对策制定中受到了不同对待。日本当局对待"静观论"态度的变迁背后隐含着的是日本对华外交政策的整体变化。"静观论"终究逃不出日本对华经济与政治侵略这一真实意图的范畴。
From 1915 to 1923, three boycott movements against Japanese commodities, which were triggered by Japan＇s Twenty-One Demands on China, formed a stage by themselves. Hioki Eki played an irreplaceable role in the process of solu- tion-making for the Japanese diplomatic authority regarding boycott movements on Japanese commodities on this stage. He proposed the ＂observation theory＂ in 1915 and received different treatments in the solutions to the three movements. The change of attitude of the Japanese diplomatic authority on the ＂observation theory＂ shows the overall change of Japan＇s diplomatic policy on China. The ＂observation theory＂ could not escape from the scope of Japan＇s true intention of economic and political invasion of China.
出处
《日语学习与研究》
CSSCI
2018年第5期90-98,共9页
Journal of Japanese Language Study and Research
基金
2013年度国家社科基金重大项目"新编日本史"(批准号13&ZD106)的阶段研究成果。项目主持人:宋志勇
关键词
日置益
静观论
抵制日货运动
二十一条
外交因应
Hioki Eki
observation theory
boycott movement on Japanese commodities
Twenty-One Demands
diplomatic solutions
