摘要
对虚假诉讼概念、虚假诉讼产生原因的梳理是破解虚假诉讼的基础。现有的规制虚假诉讼的模式、驳回诉讼请求方法与诉讼要件理论冲突,应并轨实行驳回起诉手段。积极引导第三人参诉,阐明执行案外人异议之诉和案外人申请再审诉讼标的区别;归纳第三人撤销之诉的不足及与执行中案外人申请再审和诉后案外人申请再审的适用顺序;同时,可设立案外第三人另诉制度,主张该制度与第三人撤销之诉整合,使权益受侵害的案外人完整及时地维护自身利益。
The analysis of the concept and cause of false litigation is the basis to figure out it. The existing model of governing false litigation and the method of rejecting lawsuit conflict with the litigation requirements, so we should be in line with rejecting lawsuit. We should actively guide the third party to participate in the lawsuit, clarify the difference between the outer party dissidence and the application of the outer party for the retrial,generalize the deficiency of the suit of the third party discharging the judgement and adjust the order of the outer party＇s application for retrial during execution or after suit. At the same time, the another lawsuit system of the third party in executive case can be established, advocating the integration of the system with the suit of the third party discharging the judgement, so that the outer party who has been infringed on their rights and interests will safeguard their own interests in a timely and complete manner.
作者
庄志坚
ZHUANG Zhi-jian(Wenzhou Academy of Governance,Wenzhou 325013 China)
出处
《新余学院学报》
2018年第5期89-93,共5页
Journal of Xinyu University
基金
2012年度国家社科基金项目"电子民事诉讼行为研究"(12BFX063)
关键词
民事虚假诉讼
案外第三人另诉制度
驳回诉讼请求
第三人撤销之诉
审判监督
civil false litigation
the another lawsuit system of the third party in executive case
rejecting lawsuit appeal
the suit of the third party discharging the judgement
trial supervision
