摘要
刑法对恐怖主义犯罪进行前置化处置的做法引发了传统刑法与预防刑法、保护法益与尊重人权、公共秩序与个人自由的二元博弈。在反思恐怖主义犯罪前置化处置引发的二元博弈的同时,应当承认恐怖主义犯罪前置化处置立法的正当性。司法实践表明,刑法关于恐怖主义犯罪前置化处置的条款存在立法与司法间的严重断裂,法律规定在司法实践中被扭曲,应当对这些条款的司法适用加以限制。
The pre-response to terrorist crimes by criminal law has triggered the games between the traditional criminal law and the preventive criminal law, the protection of legal interests and the respect to human rights, the public order and the individual freedom. While examining the binary oppositions triggered by the pre-response to terrorist crimes,we should admit the legitimacy of its legislation. It is shown in the judicial practice that as far as the provisions on the pre-response to terrorist crimes in our country＇s criminal law is concerned, there is a serious break between the legislation and judicature and the legal provisions are distorted. Therefore, the judicial application of these legal provisions should be restricted.
作者
王志祥
王艺丹
Wang Zhixiang;Wang Yidan(College of Criminal Law Science,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《铁道警察学院学报》
2018年第4期55-64,共10页
Journal of Railway Police College
基金
2016年国家社会科学基金重大项目"我国刑法修正的理论模型与制度实践研究"(16ZDA061)
关键词
恐怖主义犯罪
前置化处置
预防刑法
立法正当性
司法限制
terrorist crimes
pre-response
preventive criminal law
justification in legislation
restriction of judicial practice
