期刊文献+

胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除右颈部吻合与左颈部吻合的对比研究 被引量:5

A retrospective comparison of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy between right neck anastomosis and left neck anastomosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除右颈部吻合术的可行性。方法本研究采用回顾性队列研究方法。分析2013年11月至2016年10月期间。在河北医科大学第四医院胸五科行全腔镜食管癌根治颈部吻合术的169例I~Ⅲ期食管鳞状细胞癌患者临床资料。全组均行常规胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术.其中82例行右颈部吻合(右颌部吻合组),87例行左颈部吻合(左颈部吻合组)。右颈部吻合组与左颈部吻合组分别从右、左颈胸锁乳突肌前缘切口进入游离食管,经食管床上提管状胃并行食管胃端侧吻合,颈部切口均留置引流管.对比两组手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫情况及术后并发症发生率等方面情况。结果169例食管癌患者中,男101例,女68例。右颈部吻合组与左颈部吻合组在年龄、性别、肿瘤位置及肿瘤分期等方面的差异均无统计学意义(均P〉O.05)。左、右颈部吻合组的总手术时间分别为(278.3±39.4)min和(287.8±39.4)min(t=1.563,P=O.120);术中出血量分刖为(134.9±71.5)ml和(147.9±85.5)ml(t=1.074,P=O.284);淋巴结清扫数分别为(17.5±5.7)枚和(16.5±5.0)枚(t=1.190,P=O.236),差异均无统计学意义。左颈部吻合组3l例(35.6%)术后发生并发症,右颈部吻合组17例(20.7%)术后发生并发症,差异有统计学意义(X2=4.609,P=O.032)。存颈部吻合组术后发生胃排空障碍[0比6.9%(6/87),P=O.029]、吻合口漏[7.3%(6/82)比18.4%(16/87),x2=4.572,P=O.033和肺炎[18.3%(15/82)比32.2%(28/87),X2=4.294,P=O.038]的比率均较左颈部吻合组更少,差异均有统计学意义。左、右颈部吻合组分别有14例(16.1%)和4例(4.9%)患者术后转ICU(x2=4.726,P=O.030)。结论胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除右颈部吻合手术治� Objective To evaluate the feasibility of right neck anastomosis in thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy. Methods This study used a retrospective cohort study method. Clinical data of 169 patients with stage I -Ⅲ esophageal squamous cell careinoma undergoing neck anastomosis in thoracoscopic and laparoscopie esophagectomy at the Department 5 of Thoracic Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from November 2013 to October 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Eighty-two cases underwent right neck anastomosis (right neck anastomosis group) and 87 cases underwent left neck anastomosis (left neck anastomosis group). Both groups underwent routine thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer. The entry of right and left neck anastomosis group was at the anterior edge of the right and left sternocleidomastoid muscle respectively. Anastomosis of the esophagogastric junction was performed and the drainage tube was placed in the neck incision. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, lymph node dissection and morbidity of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results There were 101 males and 68 females among 169 patients with esophageal cancer. There were no significant differences in age, gender, tumor location, clinical stage between two groups (all P〉0.05). The total operation time of left and right neck anastomosis groups was (278.3±39.4) minutes and (287.8±39.4) minutes, respectively (t=1.563, P=0.120). The intraoperative blood loss was (134.9±71.5) ml and (147.9±85.5) ml, respectively (t=1.074, P=0.284). The number of lymph node dissections was (17.45±5.68) and (16.47±4.98), respectively (t=1.190, P=0.236). Seventeen cases (20.7%) in the right neck anastomosis group developed postoperative complications, while 31 cases (35.6%) in the left neck anastomosis group developed postoperative complications (X2=4.609,P=0.032). Compared with left neck anastomosis group, right n
作者 徐延昭 石新强 程净革 张月峰 温士旺 李振华 吕会来 田子强 Xu Yanzhao;Shi Xinqiang;Cheng Jingge;Zhang Yuefeng;Wen Shiwang;Li Zhenhua;Lvy Huilai;Tian Ziqiang(Department 5 of Thoracic Surgery,The Fourth Hospital,Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050011,China(Xu YZ,Cheng JG,Zhang YF,Wen SW,Li ZH,Lyv HL,Tian ZQ;Department of Anesthesiology,The fourth Hospital,Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050011,China(Shi XQ)
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第9期1008-1012,共5页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
基金 河北省医学适用技术跟踪项目(GL201637) 肿瘤领域科研成果的临床转化研究(162777114D) 河北省医学科学研究重点课题计划(20170148)
关键词 食管肿瘤 胸腔镜 腹腔镜 颈部吻合 Esophageal neoplasm Thoracoscopy Laparoseopy Neck anastomosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献75

  • 1曲家骐,侯维平,高昕,滕洪,史宁江,李铸,于修义.电视胸腔镜食管癌切除术八例初步报告[J].中华外科杂志,1996,34(2):84-86. 被引量:57
  • 2吴捷,柴.胸段食管癌三野淋巴清扫的现状[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(10):706-707. 被引量:9
  • 3杜贾军,孟龙,陈景寒,彭忠民,王磊,张林,王晓航.手辅助电视胸腔镜食管癌切除术三年临床疗效分析[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(12):822-824. 被引量:5
  • 4Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, et al Hospitalvolume and surgical mortality in the United States. N EngI J Med, 2002,346:1128-1137. 被引量:1
  • 5Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, et al. Effectiveness oti combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal car~cer. Surg Endosc, 2012,26(2): 381-390. 被引量:1
  • 6Zingg U, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, et al. Factors associated with postoperative pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann SurgOncol, 2011,18(5) : 1460-1468. 被引量:1
  • 7Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, et al. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg, 2012,255(2) : 197-203. 被引量:1
  • 8Yamamoto S, Kawahara K, Maekawa T, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for stage I and II esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2005,80(6) : 2070-2075. 被引量:1
  • 9Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, et al. Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc, 2012,26( 1 ) : 162-167. 被引量:1
  • 10Nguyen NT, Rudersdorf PD, Smith BR, et al. Management of gastrointestinal leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: conventional treatments vs. endoscopic stenting. J Gastrointest Surg, 2011,15 ( 11 ) : 1952-1960. 被引量:1

共引文献165

同被引文献67

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部