期刊文献+

高峰高原医学学科内涵提升路径研究 被引量:3

Research on the path of improving the level of medical science for achieving top disciplines construction schemes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教育部学科评估与基本科学指标数据库学科评估是中国医学学科水平的重要参考指标。当前,影响医学学科发展的主要问题有医学教育管理模式未能契合医学教育独特性、医学人才培养设计存在局限性、医学临床研究能力效率不高等。以高峰高原建设为目标导向,提升医学学科水平需要着力把握关键环节,即建立尊重医学教育特殊规律的医学教育管理模式、构筑拥有创新课程与激励制度的医学人才高地、提升以标准管理体系为保障的医学学科发展效率等。 China University Subject Ranking(CUSR) and Essential Science Indicators(ESI) are important reference indicators for China medical discipline level. The main problems affected the development of medical discipline are the medical education mode failed to fit uniqueness of medical education, the limitations of the design of medical talent training, the low efficiency of medical clinical research ability and so on. Taking the construction of "top level" as the goal oriented and improving the medical discipline level, we need to grasp the following key links: to establish the medical education mode with respect to the special pattern of medical education, to build the medical talents highland with innovation course and incentive system, and to promote the development efficiency of medical discipline based on the standard management system and so on.
作者 彭树涛 施瑾欢 PENG Shu-tao;SHI Jin-huan(CPC Committee Office,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200025,China;China Hospital Development Institute,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200025,China)
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第8期851-856,共6页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
基金 上海交通大学中国医院发展研究院科研课题计划资助(GHDI-2017-D-09)~~
关键词 医学学科 内涵建设 教育模式 人才培养 medical discipline connotation construction educational mode talent cultivation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献29

  • 1Murray Kopelow.21世纪的责任与挑战——继续医学教育、维持认证与执业资格[J].中国继续医学教育,2011,3(1):10-12. 被引量:2
  • 2曾建勋,李旭林.中国期刊高被引指数的探究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2007,18(4):555-557. 被引量:16
  • 3学位授予和人才培养学科目录(2011年)[EB/OL].http://www.chinadegrees.cn/xwyyjsjyxx/sy/glmd/272726.shtml. 被引量:4
  • 4Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure o{aMedicalSchoolEEB/OL~. (2013 06)E2013 09 161. http:// www. lcme. org/publications/functions, pdf. 被引量:1
  • 5Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of aMedical School~ LCME Accreditation StandardsEEB/OL~. E2013- 08- 231. http~//www, lcme. org publications/procedure, pd{. 被引量:1
  • 6Garfield E,Welljams-Dorof A.Of Nobel class:A citation perspective on high impact research authors[J].Theoretial Medicine,1992,13(2):117-135. 被引量:1
  • 7Michael N,Charles O.Citation counts and the Research Assessment Exercise V:Archaeology and the 2001 RAE[J].Journal Of Documentation,2003,59(6):709-730. 被引量:1
  • 8[荷]亨克·F.莫德.科研评价中的引文分析[M].佟贺丰,王炼,曹燕,等,译.北京:科学技术文献出版社,2010:157. 被引量:1
  • 9Abramo G D,Angelo C,Di Costa F.National research assessment exercises:a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings[J].Scientometrics,2011,89(3):929-941. 被引量:1
  • 10Aksnes D W,Taxt R.Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators:a comparative study at a Norwegian university[J].Research Evaluation,2004,13(1):33-41. 被引量:1

共引文献35

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部