期刊文献+

浅析PPH术在出口梗阻型排便障碍中的应用

Analysis of application of PPH in management of defecation of outlet obstruction constipation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨综合治疗(PPH)术在治疗出口梗阻型排便障碍中的疗效。方法:针对某医院收治的136例以排便困难为主诉的患者,回顾性总结分析患者单纯PPH术及PPH术同时处理合并病后临床治疗效果。结果:两种方法术后排便困难明显缓解或消失者123例,成功率90.44%,采用PPH术同时处理合并病患者主要并发症出现的更少。结论:PPH技术为治疗出口梗阻型排便困难的首选方法,PPH术同时处理合并病比传统单纯PPH术具有疗效好、并发症少等优点。 Objective:To explore the efficacy of comprehensive treatment(PPH) in the treatment of outlet obstruction constipation. Methods:A total of 136 patients suffering from defecation difficulties who were admitted to hospital were retrospectively analyzed, these patients were treated with PPH operation alone and PPH operation(simultaneous treatment of concurrent diseases). Results:There were 123 cases of defecation difficulties or disappearance of the two methods. The success rate was 90.44%. The main complications of the patients treated with PPH operation(simultaneous treatment of concurrent diseases) were less. Conclusion: PPH operation is the first choice for the treatment of outlet obstruction and defecation difficulties. The PPH operation(simultaneous treatment of concurrent diseases) has the advantages of better efficacy and less complication than traditional PPH.
作者 苏显祥 葛本玲 宋毅 童磊 SU Xian-xiang;GE Ben-ling;SONG Yi(Fengtai People's Hospital Fengtai 232100,Anhui)
出处 《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》 2018年第4期55-56,58,共3页 Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
关键词 排便障碍 综合治疗(PPH) 术后指导 Outlet obstruction constipation Comprehensive treatment (PPH)
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1《痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术(PPH)暂行规范》修订[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(4):342-342. 被引量:236
  • 2王振军,汤秀英,王东,赵博,韩炜,杨新庆,黄莚庭.内痔的病理形态改变特征及其意义[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(3):177-180. 被引量:60
  • 3张胜本,张安平.直肠黏膜内脱垂与脱垂性痔[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2006,26(7):55-57. 被引量:10
  • 4Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device : a new procedure[M]. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, Italy,1998,777-784. 被引量:1
  • 5Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2000, 355 (9206) :779-781. 被引量:1
  • 6Ganio E,Altomare DF,Gabrielli F,etal. Prospective randomized multieentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoideetomy [J]. Br J Surg,2001,88(5) :669-674. 被引量:1
  • 7Nisar PJ, Aeheson AG, Neal KR, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoideetomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials [J].Dis Colon Rectum, 2004,47(11):1837-1845. 被引量:1
  • 8Mattana C, Coco C, Manno A, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Milligan Morgan hemorrhoideetomy in the cure of fourth-degree hemorrhoids: long-term evaluation and clinical results[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007,50(11) :1770-1775. 被引量:1
  • 9Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, et al. Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoideetomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Arch Surg, 2009,144(3) : 266-272. 被引量:1
  • 10Cheetham MJ,Cohen CR,Kamm MA,et al. A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoideetomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2003,46(4) :491-497. 被引量:1

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部