摘要
浙东运河萧山段历经沧桑,南宋中期宰相史弥远出于私利,由山北改道山南.运用文献资料、实地勘察和比较法,认为故河道应为现在的山北河.同时认为改道于明代嘉靖年间的说法是不符合史实的.这一考证使运河历史事实更加确切,并改变人们对此域内人文历史文化的看法,有利于更好地保护运河,更好地贯彻落实习近平总书记关于要把大运河"保护好、利用好、传承好"的指示精神.
The Grand Canal in Xiaoshan section of East Zhejiang has undergone many vicissitudes. The prime minister Shi Mi-yuan in the mid-term of the Southern Song Dynasty diverted it from Shanbei to Shannan from private interests. Based on literature,field investigation and comparative method,it is considered that the original river course is Shanbei River nowadays. The statement of course switching during Jiajing period in the Ming Dynasty is inconsistent with historical facts.The result changes people＇s views on the cultural and historical culture in this field,which is more conducive to the protection of the canal,to implement of the spirit of the General Secretary Xi Jinping on ＂good protection,reasonable use and comprehensive inheritance＂of the Grande Canal.
作者
陈志根
CHEN Zhi-gen(Local Chronicles Office of People＇s Government of Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou 311200, Chin)
出处
《浙江水利水电学院学报》
2018年第4期1-5,共5页
Journal of Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power
关键词
南宋
浙东运河萧山段
变迁
the Southern Song Dynasty
Xiaoshan Section of the canal in East Zhejiang
change
