期刊文献+

不同麻醉方法在老年髋关节置换术患者中的应用对比 被引量:1

Comparison of the Effect of Different Anesthetic Methods in Hip Joint Replacement in the Elderly
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比不同麻醉方法在老年髋关节置换术中的应用效果。方法以2017年1—10月为研究时间,选取69例进行髋关节置换术的患者作为研究对象,随机分为腰硬联合麻醉组和全身麻醉组,全身麻醉组麻醉方法采取全身麻醉,腰硬联合麻醉组采取腰硬联合麻醉。对比两组患者麻醉情况、麻醉优良率以及不良反应情况。结果腰硬联合麻醉组麻醉情况、麻醉优良率以及不良反应情况与全身麻醉组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论老年髋关节置换术中应用腰硬联合麻醉效果优于全身麻醉,在该手术治疗中具有一定优势。 Objective To compare the efect of diferent anesthesia methods on hip arthroplasty in the elderly. Methods From January to October 2017, a total of 69 cases of application of hip joint replacement patients as the research sample, were randomly divided into combined spinal epidural anesthesia group and general anesthesia group and general anesthesia group was given anesthesia general anesthesia, combined spinal epidural anesthesia group was given combined spinal epidural anesthesia. The anaesthesia, the good rate of anesthesia and the adverse reaction were compared between the two groups. Results The anesthesia, the good rate of anesthesia and the adverse reaction of the combined spinal anesthesia group were signifcantly diferent from those in the general anesthesia group, the diference was statistically signifcant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The efect of combined spinal and hard anesthesia is superior to general anesthesia in the operation of hip replacement for the elderly, and it has some advantages in the operation.
作者 陈莹昊 CHEN Yinghao(Department of Anesthesiology,Xiangyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Xiangyang Hubei 441000,China)
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2018年第25期57-59,共3页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 全身麻醉 腰硬联合麻醉 老年人 髋关节置换术 应用 效果 general anesthesia combined spinal and epidural anesthesia elderly hip replacement application efect
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献81

同被引文献18

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部