期刊文献+

超声引导下双侧腹横肌平面阻滞复合全身麻醉在老年患者妇科开腹手术中的应用 被引量:15

Application of ultrasound-guided transverses abdominis plane block combined with general anesthesia in laparotomy of senile female patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨超声引导下双侧腹横肌平面(transversus abdominis plane,TAP)阻滞复合全身麻醉在老年妇科开腹手术应用中的安全性和有效性。方法:纳入择期行妇科良性疾病开腹手术的老年患者(年龄>65岁)60例,美国麻醉医师协会(American Association of Anesthesiologists,ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅲ级,随机分为对照组(C组)和腹横肌平面阻滞组(TAP组),每组30例。TAP组采用超声引导下双侧腹横肌平面阻滞复合全身麻醉,C组采用全身麻醉。观察2组患者麻醉诱导前(T0)、麻醉诱导后(T1)、切皮时(T2)、手术结束时(T3)、术后30 min(T4)时的平均动脉血压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、心率(heart rate,HR)等血流动力学参数,测定血清肾上腺素(adrenaline,A)、去甲肾上腺素(noradrenaline,NA)水平。随访记录患者术后2、4、8、12、24 h视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、镇痛泵按压次数、舒芬太尼补救例数及术后不良事件(恶心、呕吐、低血压、心动过缓和尿潴留等)的发生情况。结果:2组患者一般情况无统计学差异。与T0时刻[(122.8±7.0)mm Hg]相比,C组MAP值在T1[(111.7±9.4)mm Hg],T2[(102.2±8.0)mm Hg],T3[(101.1±11.9)mm Hg],T4[(105.0±5.3)mm Hg]时刻均有所下降;TAP组MAP值在T1[(113.3±10.9)mm Hg],T2[(110.1±9.4)mm Hg],T3[(109.1±11.2)mm Hg],T4[(116.5±7.2)mm Hg]有所降低(P<0.05),但是TAP组在T2~T4血压较C组平稳(两组比较P<0.05);T2、T3和T4时点TAP组血清肾上腺素[T2:(192.3±22.6)pg/m L,T3:(221.7±16.5)pg/m L,T4:(166.4±14.1)pg/m L]和去甲肾上腺素水平[T2:(140.4±17.0)pg/m L,T3:(149.6±14.4)pg/m L,T4:(116.7±21.1)pg/m L]明显降低(P<0.05);术后2~12 h VAS评分TAP组(2 h:2.40±0.50,4 h:2.27±0.45,8 h:2.06±0.71,12 h:2.03±0.61)低于C组(P<0.05),且TAP组镇痛泵按压次数[(15.3±4.1)次]及舒芬太尼补救例数(3例)均低于C组[分别为(36.5±6.9)次,12例]。2组患者术后不良事件发生情况无明显差别(P>0.05)。重复测量的方差分析结果显示,经校正后,2组间不 Objective:To explore the safety and effectiveness of transverses abdominis plane block combined with general anesthesia in senile female patients undergoing laparotomy. Methods:Sixty senile women diagnosed as benign diseases were recruited in the study according to certain criteria(ASAⅠ-Ⅲ). The patients were randomly divided into Group C(30 cases)and Group TAP(30 cases).The patients in Group C were treated with single general anesthesia during the induction and maintenance periods of anesthesia. The patients in Group TAP received TAP block as anesthesia induction and general anesthesia as maintenance. The mean arterial pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR),adrenaline(A)and noradrenaline(NA)level at the following time:before anesthesia induction(T0),after anesthesia induction(T1),skin incision(T2),suture abdominal cavity(T3),30 minutes after surgery(T4)were recorded. The VAS score,analgesic pump pressure times,the number of sufentanil remedies and adverse effects(including nausea,vomit,hypotension,bradycardia,uroschesis and traction reaction)were recorded at following time after surgery 2,4,8,12,24 hours. Results:Compared with MAP at T0[(122.8±7.0)mm Hg] in Group C,MAP of T1[(111.7±9.4)mm Hg],T2[(102.2±8.0)mm Hg],T3[(101.1±11.9) mm Hg] and T4[(105.0 ±5.3) mm Hg] were de creased.Meanwhile the MAP of Group TAP at T1[(113.3±10.9)mm Hg],T2[(110.1±9.4)mm Hg],T3[(109.1±11.2)mm Hg] and T4[(116.5 ±7.2)mm Hg] were lower than that at T0[(121.3±9.3)mm Hg]. However,during T2-T4,MAP of Group TAP was relatively stable than that of Group C. Additionally,compare with that of Group C,the adrenaline level in serum of Group TAP during T2-T4[T2:(192.3±22.6)pg/m L,T3:(221.7±16.5)pg/m L,T4:(166.4±14.1)pg/m L] were lower,while noradrenaline level of serum in Group TAP[T2:(140.4±17.0)pg/m L,T3:(149.6±14.4)pg/m L,T4:(116.7±21.1)pg/m L] were also lower. Furthermore,the average VAS scores of Grou
作者 赵娜 安民 李有长 Zhao Na;An Min;Li Youchang(Department of A nesthesiology,Chongqing Health Center for Women and Childre)
出处 《重庆医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第9期1248-1252,共5页 Journal of Chongqing Medical University
基金 重庆市卫生和计划生育委员会科研基金资助项目(编号:2016MSXM094)
关键词 腹横肌平面阻滞 超声引导 术中应激 术后镇痛 老年 transverses abdominis plane block ultrasound-guided stress reaction during operation post-operative analgesia the aged
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献82

  • 1邱桐.原发性痛经发病机制与治疗新进展[J].继续医学教育,2005,19(3):60-61. 被引量:29
  • 2张素珍.良性阵发性位置性眩晕的发病机理、临床诊断与治疗[J].继续医学教育,2006,20(20):16-22. 被引量:28
  • 3黄绍强,田复波,陈新刚.七氟烷或丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼用于腹腔镜手术麻醉的比较[J].复旦学报(医学版),2007,34(3):409-413. 被引量:26
  • 4陈绍泽 李扬.高龄心脏患者麻醉体会.河南外科学杂志,2005,7(11):84-87. 被引量:2
  • 5Mastronardi P,Dellacasa P.Observational study on the use of remifentanil in general anesthesia.Drug utilization research & Minerva Anesthesiol, 2004,70:605-616. 被引量:1
  • 6Eslamian L, Jalili Z, Jamal A, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption in elective cesarean delivery under general anes- thesia. J Anesth, 2012,26 ( 3 ) : 334-338. 被引量:1
  • 7Borglum J, Maschmann C, Belhage B, et al. Ultrasound- guided bilateral dual transversus abdominisplane block., a new four-point approach. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2011,55 (6) : 658-663. 被引量:1
  • 8Bharti N, Kumar P, Bala I, et al. The efficacy of a novel ap- proach to transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery. Anesth Analg, 2011, 112 (6) :1504-1508. 被引量:1
  • 9Abdallah FW,Laffey JG, Halpern SH, et al. Duration of anal- gesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdomi- nal incisions: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth, 2013,111 (5) : 721- 735. 被引量:1
  • 10Raft AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia, 2001,56(10) : 1024-1026. 被引量:1

共引文献375

同被引文献129

引证文献15

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部