摘要
关于中国思想史研究的方法论,学术界已有不少研究。较为引人注目者,如侯外庐学派注重思想史与社会史关联的方法论;以刘泽华为代表的王权主义学派从矛盾中陈述历史的方法论、阴阳组合结构方法论;葛兆光的从一般知识、思想与信仰中阐述思想进程的方法论;张分田提出的以罗列事实为主的研究方法;雷戈所使用的"历史-思想研究法"等等,都堪称宝贵。除此之外,还有几点应该注意:一、要充分正视思想家思想的矛盾性,以辩证的眼光看待、重视个体思想的变化、矛盾和复杂性;二、思想的演化与分化是思想史发展的正常途径,思想史研究重在弄清思想发生发展的历史线索,而非一味地回归思想的原点;三、重视思想家的学术个性研究,而不简单地把思想家套入汉代人所划定的先秦学术谱系之中,给个体思想家打上某家某派的烙印。
There are quite a few studies on the methodologies for studies of Chinese intellectual history,of which the influential ones include the school headed by Hou Wailu who attaches importance to the correlation between intellectual history and social history,the school headed by Liu Zehua whose study of monarchism interprets history through the analysis of contradictions and the Yin-Yang integration,Professor Ge Zhaoguang interprets intellectual history though an analysis of general knowledge,ideas and beliefs,Professor Zhang Fentian prefers the fact-based methodology,while Professor Lei Ge prefers the historical-ideological approach.This paper proposes the following suggestions for the relevant studies in future：it is necessary to pay attention to the inconsistency and complexities of the thinkers in a dialectic and dynamic perspective;intellectual history is a process of evolution and differentiation,whose study should reveal its historic clues rather than trace its point of departure;it is necessary to pay attention to the different academic features of individual scholars rather than put them into the pre-Qin academic pedigree proposed by some scholars of the Han dynasty.
作者
李振宏
LI Zhen-hong(School of History and Culture,Henan University,Kaifeng 475001,China)
出处
《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期125-133,共9页
Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
中国思想史
史学方法论
孔子
陆贾
“不患寡而患不均”
Chinese intellectual history
methodologies for historical studies
Confucius
Lu Jia
＂no concern over the quantity of the share but its justice＂
