摘要
包产到户、包干到户有相同之处,也有差异。相同之处在于,两者都突破了集体的土地等农业生产资料单一统一经营的做法,实行家庭承包经营,形成以此为基础的统分结合的双层经营体制,这不同于封建社会时期家族公田的租佃经营,是社会主义农村集体经济经营体制的创新。不同之处在于,两者由于集体和农民在家庭承包经营收益分配上"包"的程度不同这一收益分享权差异,使家庭承包经营与集体统一经营的关系有差异,由此形成有差异的乡村发展路径。针对乡村发展不充分和城乡发展不平衡的问题,实施乡村振兴战略,需要在促进家庭承包经营的同时,在促进统一经营发展上着力,使双层经营体制名副其实,发挥统一经营在增强乡村聚集资源能力和城乡融合发展能力中不可或缺的作用。
There are similarities and differences in the production of contracted products to households and contractors to households. The similarity between them is that they both break through the practice of single and unified operation of agricultural means of production such as collective land. It is different from the tenancy management of the clan field in the feudal period, which is the innovation of the collective economic management system in the socialist countryside. The difference between them is that the relationship between the collective and the collective management is different because of the different degree of the income distribution between the collective and the farmers in the household contract management. In view of the problem of inade- quate rural development and uneven development of urban and rural development, the implemen- tation of the rural strategy needs to promote the development of unified management while pro- moting household contract management. This will give full play to the indispensable role of uni- fied management in enhancing the capacity of gathering rural resources, as well as the ability of urban and rural integration and development.
作者
郑有贵
Zheng Yougui(Institute of Contemporary China Studies,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100009)
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第8期15-20,共6页
Teaching and Research
基金
国家社科基金重大委托项目"改革开放历史经验研究"(项目号:2015MZD009)的阶段性成果
关键词
包产到户
包干到户
收益分享权
集体积累
统一经营
双层经营体制
production quotas to households
contractors to households
income sharing rights
collective accumulation
unified operation
two-tier management system
