摘要
目前具备文化人类学倾向的"听觉文化研究"和具备文化社会学倾向的"声音政治批评"处于张力与互补共存的对话关系之中。这里有两个层面的张力和互补。第一个层面是在学理主张层面,即如何理解文化政治、声音、听觉三者动态关系。声音政治批评在这个关键问题上认为文化政治从属于声音,听觉文化研究则认为文化政治、声音、听觉三者之间均具备双向互动,于是形成了张力的关系。互补性则在于这两种学术思路的对话,在总体上深化了对上述三者"三位一体"的动态思考,实则相辅相成。第二个层面在价值取向层面,听觉文化研究的首要任务是对听觉/声音的人文课题的复杂性的"求真",声音政治批评的首要使命是"批判",于是形成张力。互补则在于,两者都是从声音/听觉角度来考察现代人的真实处境,并探索改善之道,求真与批判是更高一层意义上"求真"的一体两面。
The "auditory cultural studies" with a cultural anthropology tendency and the "vocal political criticism" with a cultural sociology tendency are in a dialogic relationship where tension and complementation coexist. There are two levels of tension and complementation. The first pair is at the level of an academic proposition on how to understand the dynamic relationship between cultural politics,sound, and hearing. For vocal political criticism, cultural politics is subordinate to sound, while for auditory cultural studies, there is atwo-way interaction between cultural politics, sound, and hearing, which forms a relationship of tension. The dynamic thinking of the "trinity" of these three subjects is deepened through the dialogue between the two academic ideas, in fact, they complement each other.Secondly, at the level of value orientation, the primary task of auditory cultural studies is to"seek truth"about the complexity of humanities subjects on auditory sense/sound. The primary mission of vocal political criticism is tocriticize, thus raising tension. Both of them inspect the real situation of modern people from the perspective of sound/auditory sense and explore a way to improve. Truth-seeking and criticism are the two sides of"truth-seeking"at a higher level, which represents complementarity.
出处
《探索与争鸣》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第7期68-73,共6页
Exploration and Free Views
基金
北京市社会科学基金项目"都市听觉文化研究"(14WYB036)
关键词
听觉文化研究
声音政治批评
文化批评
文化研究
Auditory cultural studies
Vocal Political Criticism
Cultural Criticism
Cultural Studies
