期刊文献+

MRI与螺旋CT对直肠癌术前分期对照分析 被引量:12

A comparative analysis of preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MRI and spiral CT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比MRI与螺旋CT对直肠癌术前分期的诊断效果。方法:选择经病理检查确诊的直肠癌患者110例,对其进行MRI与螺旋CT检查。将病理结果作为金标准,对比螺旋CT与MRI对本组患者T分期与N分期的诊断效果。结果:MRI对本组T_1~T_2期诊断的准确率为93.33%,高于螺旋CT的50.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);螺旋CT与MRI对本组T3期与T4期诊断准确率对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。MRI对本组患者N分期诊断的灵敏度与特异度高于螺旋CT组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);螺旋CT与MRI对本组患者N分期诊断的阴性预测值、阳性预测值与准确率对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:相较于螺旋CT,MRI在直肠癌T_1~T_2分期诊断及N分期灵敏度与特异度方面更具优势,可以作为首选方法应用于临床。 Objective:To compare the diagnosis of preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MRI and spiral CT.Methods:110 cases of rectal cancer diagnosed by pathological examination were selected and examined by MRI and spiral CT.The pathological results were used as the gold standard to compare the diagnostic effects of spiral CT and MRI on T staging and N staging in this group.Results:The accuracy rate of MRI in diagnosis of T_1~T_2 in this group was 93.33%,higher than that in spiral CT 50%,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05).There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of T_3 and T_4 between the two groups(P〈0.05).The sensitivity of MRI for this group of patients with N staging and specificity was higher than that of spiral CT group,the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05);negative predictive spiral CT and MRI in the group of patients with N staging diagnosis value,positive predictive value and accuracy comparison showed no significant difference(P〈0.05).Conclusion:Compared with spiral CT,MRI has more advantages in the T_1~T_2 staging of rectal cancer and the sensitivity and specificity of N staging.It can be used as the first choice for clinical application.
作者 徐志鹏 李军堂 邢杰 吕奎荣 Xu Zhipeng;Li Juntang;Xing Jie(Magnetic Resonance Chamber of Qingdao Municipal Hospital East Hospital(Qingdao 266000)
出处 《陕西医学杂志》 CAS 2018年第7期862-864,共3页 Shaanxi Medical Journal
关键词 直肠肿瘤/诊断 磁共振成像 多层螺旋计算机 体层摄影术 Rectal neoplasms/diagnosis Magnetic resonance imaging Multidetectorcomputed tomography
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献102

共引文献122

同被引文献98

引证文献12

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部