期刊文献+

显微镜辅助下经椎间孔椎间融合微创治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效比较 被引量:10

Clinical effects of microscope assisted minimal invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar inter-body fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨显微镜辅助下经椎间孔椎间融合微创手术(MIS-TLIF)治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析2016年1月-2017年1月空军军医大学西京医院骨科160名腰椎退变性疾病患者的临床资料,其中80例行开放经椎间孔椎间融合术(TLIF)为对照组,80例行显微镜辅助下MIS-TLIF为观察组。对比两组患者手术前后腿痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、手术时间、手术切口长度、术中出血量、术后引流量、X线照射时间、术后椎间植骨融合率以及并发症情况等。结果观察组和对照组患者手术切口长度分别为(3.7±0.8)cm和(8.2±1.5)cm,手术出血量分别为(63.2±30.3)mL和(170.6±21.4)mL,术后引流量分别为(22.1±10.7)mL和(80.2±20.3)mL,X线照射时间分别为(26.1±3.7)S和(16.5±4.2)s,差异均有统计学意义(t=23.680、25.902、22.651、15.343,P值均〈0.01)。观察组和对照组患者术后1年VAS分别为(0.68±0.41)分和(1.95±0.64)分,ODl分别为7.29%±3.60%和12.70%±4.27%,差异均有统计学意义(t=14,950、8.664,P值均〈0.01)。观察组的神经根损伤、硬膜囊撕裂、马尾神经损伤等并发症发生率分别为1.25%(1/80)、0、0,低于对照组的13.75%(11/80)、10.00(8/80)、11.25%(9/80),差异均有统计学意义(X^2=7.297、6.447、7.535,P值均〈0.05);而椎间植骨融合率100.00%(80/80)则高于对照组的83.75%(67/80),差异有统计学意义(X^2=12.057,P〈0.01)。结论显微镜辅助下MIS-TLIF微创手术治疗腰椎退变性疾病疗效好、安全性高,手术创伤小、术后恢复快,建议临床推广应用。 Objective To assess the clinical effects and safety of microscope assisted minimal invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar inter-body fusion(MIS-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Methods From January 2016 to January 2017, 160 patients of lumbar degenerative disease were retrospectively analyzed. Eighty patients underwent TLIF (the control group) and 80 patients underwent microscope assisted MIS-TLIF (the observation group). Clinical evaluation: visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), blood loss, postoperative drainage, X-irradiate time, length of hospital stay and interbody fusion rate. Results The surgical incision length was (3.7± 0.8 ) cm in the observation group and (8.2 ± 1.5 ) cm in the control group. The blood loss was (63.2 ±30.3 ) mL in observation group and ( 170.6 ± 21.4) mL in control group. The postoperative drainage flow was (22. 1± 10.7) mL in observation group and (80.2 ± 20.3 ) mL in the control group. The X-ray exposure time was (26.1±3.7 ) s in observation group and( 16.5±d. 2)s in control group, There were all significant differences between the two groups(t =23. 680, 25. 902, 22. 651, 15. 343, all P values 〈 0.01 ). The VAS scores (0.68 ± 0.41 vs. 1.95±0.64, t =14.950, P〈0.01) and the ODI (7.29%±3.60% vs. 12.70%±4.27%, t= 8. 664, P 〈 0.01 ) showed significant differences between the observation group and the control group at one year of follow-up. The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group( P 〈 0.05 ). The rate of intervertebral bone graft fusion in the observation group was higher than that in the control group ( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusions MIS-TLIF assisted by microscope is a safe and effective treatment for lumbar degenerative disease. Patients with this operation have less traumas and recover faster after operation. Microscope assisted TLIF is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者 张永峰 张世磊 袁斌 王哲 罗卓荆 闫铭 Zhang Yongfeng;Zhang Shilei;Yuan Bin;Wang Zhe;Luo Zhuojing;Yan Ming(Department of Orthopedics,Xijing Hospital,Medical University of Air Force,Xi'an 710032,China)
出处 《中华解剖与临床杂志》 2018年第3期198-202,共5页 Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics
关键词 腰椎退变性疾病 椎间孔椎间融合术 显微外科手术 Lumbar degenerative disease Micrographlc surgery Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Microsurgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献133

  • 1王庆敏,陈鲁峰,曾蔚林,吴志君,郑庆丰,胡冬平,林哲辉.经MAST Quadrant通道下微创腰椎融合术近期疗效观察[J].临床骨科杂志,2011,14(6):605-608. 被引量:15
  • 2侯树勋.客观评价各种治疗腰椎间盘突出症手术的疗效[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(4):250-251. 被引量:11
  • 3Masuda K, Aota Y, Muehleman C, et al. A novel rabbit model of mild, reproducible disc degeneration by an annulus needle punc- ture: correlation between the degree of disc injury and radiological and histological appearances of disc degeneration. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) ,2005,30( 1 ) :5 - 14. 被引量:1
  • 4Hanley EN Jr, Herkowitz HN, Kirkpatrick JS, et al. Debating the value of spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2010,92(5 ) :1293 - 1304. 被引量:1
  • 5Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Comparative effective- ness evidence from the spine patient outcomes research trial: surgi- cal versus nonoperative care for spinal stenosis, degenerative spon- dylolisthesis, and intervertebral disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,2011,36(24) :2061 -2068. 被引量:1
  • 6FritzeU P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, et al. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgicaltreatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ) ,2001,26 (23) :2521 - 2534. 被引量:1
  • 7Putzier M, Strube P, Funk JF, et al. Allogenic versus autologous cancellous bone in lumbar segmental spondylodesis: a randomized prospective study. Eur Spine J, 2009,18 (5) : 687 - 695. 被引量:1
  • 8Siewe J, Otto C, Knoell P, et al. Comparison of standard fusion with a" topping off" system in lumbar spine surgery: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2011,12 : 239. 被引量:1
  • 9Sengupta DK. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am,2004,35( 1 ) :43 -56. 被引量:1
  • 10Nibu K, Panjabi MM, Oxland T, et al. Intervertebral disc distrac- tion with a laparoscopic anterior spinal fusion system. Eur Spine J, 1998,7(2) :142 - 147. 被引量:1

共引文献99

同被引文献82

引证文献10

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部