期刊文献+

网络股权众筹平台的关键风险因素——基于扎根理论和层次分析法的研究 被引量:1

The Key Risk Factors of Equity Crowdfunding Platforms——A Study Based on Grounded Theory and Analytical Hierarchy Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 股权众筹作为一种新型的互联网金融模式,在国内外得以迅速发展,而处于股权众筹产业链核心的股权众筹平台也层出不穷,并伴随着种种风险。本文以16家股权众筹平台为研究对象,通过扎根理论方法识别出了股权众筹平台在现行的金融监管情境下和实际业务过程中的46个风险因素并形成风险指标体系,再利用层次分析法(AHP)对各层指标的相对重要性进行排序,提炼出15个关键的风险因素。最后基于研究结论,对股权众筹平台的风险控制提出了相应的政策建议。 As a new type of Internet Finance model, equity crowdfunding has been rapidly developing both at home and abroad. Equity crowdfunding platforms, which are at the core of the equity crowdfunding industry chain, emerge in endlessly with risks exploding here and there. We take 16 equity crowdfunding platforms as the research objects, use the qualitative research method of grounded theory to identify 46 risk factors and form the risk-index system of the equity crowdfunding platforms in the current financial regulatory environment and its actual business process. After that we use Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP) to rank these factors according to its relative importance and then extract 15 key risk factors. Finally, based on the conclusion of the study, we put forward corresponding policy recommendations to control the risk of equity crowdfunding platforms.
作者 冯彦杰 孙传超 张超亿 齐佳音 FENG Yanjie;SUN Chuanchao;ZHANG Chaoyi;QI Jiayin
出处 《上海立信会计金融学院学报》 2018年第4期29-46,共18页 Journal of Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance
基金 国家自然科学基金重大研究计划(项目编号91546121) 国家社科重大研究项目(16ZDA055) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(项目编号16YJA630011)
关键词 股权众筹 扎根理论 层次分析法 风险因素 指标体系 Equity crowdfunding Grounded theory Analytical hierarchy process Risk factor Index system
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献127

  • 1王振,刘茂.应用区间层次分析法(IAHP)研究高层建筑火灾安全因素[J].安全与环境学报,2006,6(1):12-15. 被引量:65
  • 2Crowdfunding Industry Report: Market Trends, Composition and Crowdfunding Platforms.Crowdsourcing.org. May, 2012. 被引量:1
  • 3The Crowdfunding Industry Report. Crowdsourcing.org. April, 2013. 被引量:1
  • 4网贷之家http://www.wangdaizhijia.com/. 被引量:1
  • 5Hazen, T. Crowdfunding or Frawdfunding? Social Networks and the Securities Laws:Why the Specially Tailored Exemption Must Be Conditioned on Meaningful Disclosure [J]. North Carolina Law Review, 2012, ( 1 ) :56-145. 被引量:1
  • 6Heminway, J. , Shelden, H. Proceed at Your Peril: Crowdfunding and the Securities Act of 1933 [J]. Tennessee Law Review, 2011, (3) :879-920. 被引量:1
  • 7易宪容,2014,《当前互联网金融最大风险是信用风险》,《证券日报》3月8日. 被引量:1
  • 8张鹏,2013,《P2P探路互联网金融信用体系建设》,《中国高新技术产业导报》12月9日. 被引量:1
  • 9Collier, B.C., and Hampshire R., 2010. "Sending Mixed Signals.Multilevel Reputation Effects in Peer -to -Peer Lending Markets" Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, ( 2 ). 197-206. 被引量:1
  • 10Everett, C., 2010. "Group Membership, Relationship Banking and Loan Default Risk. The Case of Online Social Lending" http.//srn.com/abstract=1114428. 被引量:1

共引文献3097

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部