期刊文献+

选择性短节段减压融合治疗高龄多节段退行性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效 被引量:1

The Clinical Efficacy of Selective Short Segmental Decompression and Fusion Therapy in the Treatment of Multistage Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨分析选择性短节段减压融合治疗高龄多节段退行性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效.方法:选取我院收治的44例高龄多节段腰椎管狭窄症患者,将所有患者随机分为观察组与对照组,2组均为22例.观察组接受选择性短节段减压融合术,对照组接受多节段减压融合术.比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量及治疗前后VAS、JOA、ODI评分.结果:观察组手术时间及术中出血量均明显少于对照组(P〈0.05);观察组与对照组治疗后VAS、JOA、ODI评分均优于治疗前(P〈0.05),2组治疗前后VAS、JOA、ODI评分的差异比较无统计学意义(P〉0.05).结论:选择性短节段减压融合治疗高龄多节段退行性腰椎管狭窄,创伤更小,疗效肯定,稳定性好,值得推广. Objective: To explore the clinical effect of selective short segmental decompression and fusion in the treatment of multistage degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: All patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 22 ca- ses in both groups. The experimental group received selective short segmental decompression and fusion, and the control group received multi -segmental decompression and fusion. The duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss and treatment of VAS, JOA and ODI were compared between the two groups. Results: The duration of operation and intraoperative blood loss in the experimental group were significantly lower than that in the control group ( P 〈 0.05 ). The scores of VAS, JOA and ODI were better than those before treatment ( P 〈 0.05 ), and the differences between VAS, JOA and ODI scores before and after treatment were not statistically significant ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion: Selective short segmental decompression and fusion therapy is more effective and effective in the treatment of the lower lum- bar vertebral canal stenosis.
作者 翁阳华 黎佩珍 伊莉 张洪亮 李忠辉 WENG Yang - hua;LI Pei - zhen;YI Li(Dongguan humen hospital,Dongguan,Guangdong52390)
机构地区 东莞市虎门医院
出处 《中国伤残医学》 2018年第13期5-6,共2页 Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
关键词 选择性短节段减压融合术 多节段退行性腰椎管狭窄症 高龄患者 Selective short segment decompression and fusion Multisegment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis Elderly
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1石洋,常楚,杨璐,江再旺,王国栋,施伯瀚.后外侧植骨融合与后路椎间植骨融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效评价[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(8):2394-2398. 被引量:14
  • 2颜连启,宦诚,孙钰,王静成,刘荣,张武林,虞堂云,冯新民,陶玉平,杨建东.腰椎融合固定和非融合固定生物力学分析[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(15):4432-4437. 被引量:10
  • 3孙永生,梁朝,温建民.腰椎融合及其临床应用策略[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(16):4621-4626. 被引量:10
  • 4崔显峰,朱悦.退行性腰椎不稳定的诊断研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(7):539-542. 被引量:20
  • 5Goldstein CL,Macwan K,Sundararajan K,et al. Comparative Outcomes of Minimally invasive Surgery for Posterior Lumbar Fusion:A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. 被引量:1
  • 6Ntoukas V, Muller A. Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2010;53(1): 21-24. 被引量:1
  • 7Lee KH,Yue WM,Yeo W, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(11 ):2265-2270. 被引量:1
  • 8Park P, Garton HJ,Gala VC,et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion:review of the literature. Spine. 2004;29(17): 1938-1944. 被引量:1
  • 9Xia XP, Chen HL,Cheng HB. Prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration after spine surgery. Spine. 2013;38 (7):597-608. 被引量:1
  • 10Guyer RD,McAfee PC,Banco RJ,et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year foUow-up. Spine J. 2009;9:374-386. 被引量:1

共引文献22

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部