期刊文献+

考虑后悔厌恶的私募股权基金投资组合优化模型 被引量:5

Portfolio optimization with private equity funds considering regret aversion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在经典的Merton连续时间资产组合框架内引入非流动性的私募股权基金,探讨流动性约束对投资组合配置的影响.假设投资者具有终端投资组合财富的后悔厌恶型效用函数,通过求解动态承诺与投资组合优化问题,给出了投资者如何最优的向私募股权基金承诺资本,以及如何在股票和债券之间进行最优的动态再调整.通过数值模拟比较分析了后悔厌恶型投资者和CRRA型投资者的最优投资组合策略的变化情况.结果发现,由于私募股权基金非流动性的影响,后悔厌恶型投资者对私募股权基金的承诺比率低于CRRA型投资者的承诺比率,从而获得较低的投资组合财富. This paper incorporates an illiquid private equity fund into the framework of Merton's classic theory on continous time portfolio selection, to explore the impacts of illiquidity on the restricted investor's optimal portfolio allocations. Assuming an investor derives regret aversion utility from terminal portfolio wealth, the paper solves for a dynamic commitment and portfolio strategy that shows investors how to optimally commit capital to private equity fund and how to optimally rebalance between liquid stock and bonds over time.Furthermore, the optimal portfolio strategies of regret averse investors and CRRA investors are analyzed and compared. The numerical analysis demonstrates that, as a consequence from illiquidity, regret averse investors' commitment rate to private equity funds are lower than that of CRRA investors, and thus the regret averse investors get lower terminal portfolio wealth than the CRRA investors.
作者 胡支军 贺阳 Hu Zhijun;He Yang(School of Mathematics and Statistics,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China;Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Public Big Data,Guiyang 550025,China)
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期365-377,共13页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71361003) 贵州省教育厅人文社科规划资助项目(13S5D005)
关键词 私募股权基金 资产配置 后悔厌恶 承诺策略 非流动性 private equity funds asset allocation regret aversion commitment strategy illiquidity
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1Zaras K. Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute stochastic dominance for determinist and stochastic evaluation problems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130(2): 305-314. 被引量:1
  • 2Mousavi S M, Jolai F, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R. A fuzzy stochastic multi-attribute group decision-making approach for selection problems[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2013, 22(2): 207-233. 被引量:1
  • 3Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-291. 被引量:1
  • 4Hu J H, Yang L. Dynamic stochastic multi-criteria decision making method based on cumulative prospect theory and set pair analy- sis[J]. Systems Engineering Procedia, 2011, 2(1): 432-439. 被引量:1
  • 5张洁,朱建军,刘思峰.基于前景理论的随机概率信息群集结模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(1):5-10. 被引量:1
  • 6Tan C Q, Ip W H, Chen X H. Stochastic multiple criteria decision making with aspiration level based on prospect stochastic domi- nance[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 70(1): 231-241. 被引量:1
  • 7Zeelenberg M. Anticipated regret, expect feedback, and behavioral decision making[J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1999, 12(2): 93-106. 被引量:1
  • 8Zeelenberg M, Pieters R. Beyond valence in customer dissatisfaction: A review and new finding on behavioral responses to regret and disappointment in fail services[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2004, 57(4): 445-455. 被引量:1
  • 9Kujawski E. A reference-dependent regret model for deterministic tradeoff studies[J]. System Engineering, 2005, 8(2): 119-137. 被引量:1
  • 10Klubeck M. Metrics : How to Improve Key Business Results[M]. NewYork: Apress, 2011. 被引量:1

共引文献21

同被引文献59

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部