摘要
落实证据裁判,完善证据制度,是我国司法改革在技术层面的重要议题,其中包括对证据排除规则体系的建构。从比较法和制度史角度观之,排除规则体系主要是英国司法制度变革的产物。18世纪至19世纪初的一些诉讼程序变动为以排除规则筛选庭审证据这种管控方式,提供了发展动因。首先,陪审团的转型造就了二元管控结构和处于信息弱势地位的事实认定者,这为排除规则的发展确立了制度空间。其次,证据成为危险性信息源,产生了排除规则立法的实践需求。最后,激励对抗式举证和支撑言词论辩式庭审的需要,成为排除规则得以长远发展的程序驱动。对这些发展动因的制度史解释,能够为反思当代我国排除规则立法的可行性和必要性提供参照。
The implementation of evidentiary adjudication and improvement of the evidence system are important issues in China＇s judicial reform at its technical level, including the establishment of an evi- dence exclusionary rule system. From a comparative and historical perspective, these exclusionary rules are mainly derived from the British judicial system. Some changes in judicial procedures between the eigh- teenth and the early nineteenth centuries provided motives for developing exclusionary rules to screen trial evidence. In the first place, the transformation of the jury stablished the dualistic-regulation-structure and put the fact-finders in a disadvantageous position of information, which provided institutional space for exclusionary rules. Second, evidence became a dangerous information source, which necessities for legislating exclusionary rules. Lastly, the need to stimulating the a generated practical dversary proof and backup verbal debating trial provided a long-run procedural drive for exclusionary rules. A historical in terpretation of these developing motives will serve as a reference for rethinking the feasibility and necessi- ty of exclusionary rules legislation in contemporary China.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期671-700,共30页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
2016年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"审判中心主义改革与证据法调控"(项目编号:16YJC820005)的研究成果
关键词
证据法
排除规则
陪审团
对抗制
司法改革
Evidence Law
Exclusionary Rules
Jury
Adversarial System
Judicial Reform
