期刊文献+

初治妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者的治疗效果分析——北京协和医院30年回顾性队列研究 被引量:9

Clinical outcome of patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia receiving primary treatment at Peking Union Medical College Hospital: a 30-year retrospective cohort study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨初治妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)患者的治疗效果及治疗情况的变化。方法收集1985年1月—2015年12月期间在中国医学科学院北京协和医院接受初次治疗的GTN患者1 711例,其中前15年537例(1985—2000年组)、后15年1 174例(2001—2015年组)。比较两组患者的治疗效果,进一步比较不同国际妇产科联盟(FIGO,2000年)临床分期及预后评分的两组初治GTN患者的治疗效果,并对前、后15年初治GTN患者治疗情况(包括化疗方案和疗程数)的变化进行分析。结果(1)初治GTN患者的总完全缓解率为93.7%(1 603/1 711),其中2001—2015年组较1985—2000年组显著提高[分别为98.4%(1 155/1 174)、83.4%(448/537);χ2=139.353,P〈0.01)。进一步分析显示,临床分期为Ⅲ期(包括预后评分为0-6分和≥7分)、Ⅳ期患者中,2001—2015年组患者的完全缓解率均明显高于1985—2000年组(P〈0.01);而在Ⅰ、Ⅱ期(包括预后评分为0-6分和≥7分)患者中,两组患者的完全缓解率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。(2)初治完全缓解的1 603例GTN患者中,总复发率为2.7%(43/1 603),其中1985—2000年组和2001—2015年组分别为3.6%(16/448)和2.3%(27/1 155),两组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=6.867,P=0.142)。(3)初治GTN患者的总死亡率为2.6%(44/1 711),其中2001—2015年组较1985—2000年组显著下降[分别为1.6%(19/1 174)和4.7%(25/537);χ2=13.830,P〈0.01)。进一步分析显示,仅Ⅲ期高危(预后评分≥7分)患者的死亡率在两组中比较有明显差异(χ2=9.505,P〈0.01),而两组间Ⅲ期低危(预后评分为0-6分)、Ⅳ期患者的死亡率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。(4)2001—2015年组与1985—2000年组相比,化疗方案中的氟尿嘧啶逐渐被氟脲苷取代,总化疗疗程数在Ⅲ期低危患者中显著减� ObjectiveTo summarize and analyze the clinical outcomes of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) patients receiving primary treatment at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from 1985 to 2015, and investigate the changes in treatment efficacy between the first and the second 15 years.MethodsClinical data of GTN patient receiving primary chemotherapy at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1985 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. It further compared the therapeutic results and chemotherapy cycles given to GTN patients, according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO, 2000) prognostic score system, who were classified to different stages and low- or high-risk groups.ResultsIn total, 1 711 GTN patients were included in this study. Comparing the 1985—2000 group and the 2001—2015 group, the results showed that: (1) while the overall complete remission (CR) rate was 93.7% (1 603/1 711) , the CR rate of 2001—2015 group was significantly higher than that of 1985—2000 group [98.4% (1 155/1 174) vs 83.4% (448/537) , χ2=139.353, P〈0.01]. This difference was significant between stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ patients, but nonexistent between stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ patients, including low- and high-risk groups. (2) The relapse rate of patients who had been in CR was 2.7% (43/1 603) , with no significant differences between the groups of 1985—2001 and 2001—2015 [3.6% (16/448) vs 2.3% (27/1 155) , χ2=6.867, P=0.142]. (3) The overall mortality rate was 2.6% (44/1 711) , which significantly decreased in 2001—2015 group compared to 1985—2000 group [1.6% (19/1 174) vs 4.7% (25/537) , χ2=13.830, P〈0.01]. This difference appeared only in high-risk patients with stage Ⅲ disease (χ2=9.505, P〈0.01) . (4) Fluorouracil was gradually replaced by floxridine in chemotherapy regimens. The total cycles of chemotherapy regimens given to low-risk patients with stage Ⅲ disease significantly decreased in 2001—
作者 蒋芳 杨阳 计鸣良 杨隽钧 赵峻 任彤 冯凤芝 万希润 向阳 Jiang Fang;Yang Yang;Ji Mingliang;Yang Junjun;Zhao Jun;Ren Tong;Feng Fengzhi;Wan Xirun;Xiang Yang(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第6期364-370,共7页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 妊娠滋养细胞疾病 肿瘤治疗方案 治疗结果 Gestational trophoblastic disease Antineoplastic protocols Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献43

  • 1Moodley M,Tunkyi K,Moodley J.Gestational trophoblastic syndrome:an audit of 112 patients.A South African experience.Int J Gynecol Cancer,2003,13:234-239. 被引量:1
  • 2Song HZ,Yang XY,Xiang Y.Forty-five year's experience of the treatment of choriocarcinoma and invasive mole.Int J Gynaecol Obstet,1998,60 Suppl 1:S77-83. 被引量:1
  • 3Kim SJ,Bae SN,Kim JH,et al.Effects of multiagent chemotherapy and independent risk factors in the treatment of high-risk GTF:25 years experiences of KRI-TRD.Int J Gynaecol Obstet,1998,60 Suppl 1:S85-96. 被引量:1
  • 4Ngan HY,Lopes AD,Lauder IJ,et al.An evaluation of the prognostic factors in metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease.Int J Gynecol Cancer,1994,4:36-42. 被引量:1
  • 5Weed JC Jr,Woodward KT,Hammond CB.Choriocarcinoma metastatic to the brain:therapy and prognosis.Semin Oncol,1982,9:208-212. 被引量:1
  • 6Weed JC Jr,Jelovsek FR,Tyrey L,et al.Intensive inpatient therapy and survival in gestational trophoblastic disease.Gynecol Oncol,1983,15:363-369. 被引量:1
  • 7杨秀玉,向阳,宋鸿钊,等.耐药及危重绒癌病例治疗的研究.中国医学科学院中国协和医科大学年鉴,2000.78-80. 被引量:2
  • 8Matsui H,Iitsuka Y,Suzuka K,et al.Salvage chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumor.J Reprod Med,2004,49:438 -442. 被引量:1
  • 9Lurain JR.Pharmacotherapy of gestational trophoblastic disease.Expert Opin Pharmacother,2003,4:2005-2017. 被引量:1
  • 10Escobar PF,Lurain JR,Singh DK,et al.Treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with etoposide,methotrexate,actinomycin D,cyclophosphamide,and vincristine chemotherapy.Gynecol Oncol,2003,91:552-557. 被引量:1

共引文献24

同被引文献68

引证文献9

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部