摘要
目的:探究盆底治疗仪治疗慢性盆腔疼痛的疗效,为慢性盆腔疼痛的治疗提供依据。方法:选取本院2015年6月-2016年6月收治的慢性盆腔疼痛患者70例,依据随机数字表法将其分为观察组35例和对照组35例。对照组给予桂枝茯苓胶囊,观察组给予盆腔治疗仪治疗,治疗共进行4周。对两组治疗前后血清白细胞介素-6(Serum interleukin-6,IL-6)、疼痛评分、盆底肌力及复发率情况进行对比。结果:治疗后,观察组IL-6、疼痛评分分别为(16.35±4.54)ng/L、(2.34±1.23)分,对照组IL-6、疼痛评分分别为(22.65±5.37)ng/L、(4.86±1.56)分。治疗前,两组患者IL-6、疼痛评分情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组IL-6、疼痛评分均降低,且观察组明显低于对照组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,观察组VSP、阴道收缩持续时间、VRP分别为(3.65±0.78)k Pa、(5.78±2.47)s、(3.56±0.68)k Pa,对照组VSP、阴道收缩持续时间、VRP分别为(2.12±0.46)k Pa、(3.58±1.45)s、(2.64±0.42)k Pa。治疗前,两组VSP、阴道收缩持续时间、VRP比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组VSP、阴道收缩持续时间、VRP均提高,且观察组明显高于对照组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组复发率为20.00%,对照组为45.71%,观察组复发率明显低于对照组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:盆底治疗仪可有效降低慢性盆腔疼痛患者疼痛状况,改善其盆底肌力,降低复发率。
Objective：To explore the curative effect of pelvic floor therapy instrument for chronic pelvic pain,and provide the basis for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain.Method：A total of 70 patients with chronic pelvic pain admitted in our hospital from June 2015 to June 2016 were selected.According to the random number table method,they were divided into observation group（35 cases）and control group（35 cases）.The control group were given Cinnamon Tuckahoe Capsule,and the observation group were treated with pelvic cavity therapy instrument for 4 weeks.The serum interleukin-6（IL-6）,pain score,pelvic floor muscle strength and recurrence rate were compared before and after treatment in the two groups.Result：After treatment,the IL-6 and pain scores in the observation group were（16.35±4.54）ng/L,（2.34±1.23） scores,and in the control group were（22.65±5.37）ng/L and（4.86±1.56） scores respectively.Before treatment,there were no differences in IL-6 and pain scores between the two groups（P〈0.05）.After treatment,the IL-6 and pain scores of the two groups were all decreased,and the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group,the differences were statistically significant（P〈0.05）.After treatment,VSP,vaginal contraction duration and VRP in the observation group were（3.65±0.78）k Pa,（5.78±2.47）s,（3.56±0.68）k Pa,and in the control group were（2.12±0.46）k Pa,（3.58±1.45）s,（2.64±0.42）k Pa respectively.Before treatment,there were no differences in the VSP,vaginal contraction duration and VRP between the two groups（P〈0.05）.After treatment, VSP,vaginal contraction duration and VRP of two groups were all increased, and the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group（P〈0.05）.The recurrence rate of the observation group was 20%,the control group was 45.71%,and the recurrence rate of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group,the difference was statistically signi
作者
朱虹
祝健婵
熊小琴
黄翠焕
ZHU Hong;ZHU Jianchan;XIONG Xiaoqin(The People＇s Hospital of Jiangmen,Jiangmen 529000,Chin)
出处
《中国医学创新》
CAS
2018年第13期38-41,共4页
Medical Innovation of China
基金
江门市科技计划项目(2016020300050000942)
关键词
盆底治疗仪
慢性盆腔疼痛
Pelvic floor therapy instrument
chronic pelvic pain
