摘要
后真相时代的话语扑朔迷离,往往事实被掩盖,真相被扭曲,话语研究面临新的挑战。批评话语分析主要从社会文化视角解释话语结构、社会结构和意识形态之间的关系;架构理论侧重于从认知视角阐释话语理解和接受的认知机制。鉴于认知语言学与批评话语分析的根本使命和主要理念基本一致,二者日趋融合。为了更加客观地分析话语和理性地看待问题,本文提出批评架构分析的新路径:在描述语言特征层面引入架构的新视角;在阐释推理过程和话语之间的关系层面引入操作性更强的架构隐喻模式;在解释推理过程与社会结构之间的关系层面引入道德模式作为分析意识形态的工具,使批评分析落到实处。
The discourse in the post-truth era is more complicated and confusing than ever with the facts covered and the truth distorted in most cases, therefore, discourse studies arc now facing new challenges. Critical Discourse Analysis is mainly used to explain the relationship among discourse structures, social structures and ideology from a socio-cnltural perspective while Framing Theory mainly focuses on the cognitive mechanisms of discourse understanding and acceptance from a cognitive per- spective. Since the main tasks and primary ideas of cognitive linguistics and critical discourse analysis has a lot in common, they have been increasingly integrated. In order to analyze the discourse more objectively and rationally, this paper puts for- ward Critical Framing Analysis as a new approach to discourse analysis by introducing a new perspective of framing for linguis- tic analysis, implementing a more operative framing metaphorical model to explain the relationship between inference process and discourse, and utilizing the moral models as a tool to analyze the ideology and to explain the relationship between inference process and social structures, so that the critical analysis can be more applicable.
出处
《外语教学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期29-34,共6页
Foreign Language Education
基金
国家社科基金重点项目"习近平总书记语言风格研究"(项目编号:18AYY022)
江苏省社会科学重点项目"中国政治话语体系的认知构建研究"(项目编号:15YYA002)
江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目"一带一路"官方媒体话语策略的认知研究"(项目编号:2017SJB0352)的阶段性研究成果
