摘要
《刑法修正案(九)》将考试中的一系列违背公平公正原则、破坏国家考试秩序、损害其他考生利益的作弊行为纳入到刑法规制的范围当中。尽管考试作弊行为入罪是增强国家考试制度的公信力,保护考生在考试中公平竞争的重要权益的有力举措,但是学界对于替考行为入刑的争议仍未停止,司法实践对于代替考试罪构成要件的分析认定因存在不同见解而影响了代替考试罪的司法适用。
The Criminal Law Amendment（ Nine） incorporates a series of cheating in examinations that violate the principle of fairness and impartiality,undermine the national examination order,and jeopardize the interests of other candidates,into the scope of criminal law. Undoubtedly,the offense of cheating on exams is a powerful move to enhance the credibility of the national examination system and protect the important rights and interests of the candidates who compete fairly in the examinations. However,the academics are still chattering about the entry into criminal of substitute for examinations. At the same time,the different opinions on the analysis of the constitution of substitute for examinations in judicial practice have a direct impact on the judicial application of it,which deserves further discussion.
作者
潘照东
PAN Zhaodong(Law School,Zhengzhou Universit)
出处
《河南教育学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2018年第2期81-86,共6页
Journal of Henan Institute of Education(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
代替考试罪
必要性
犯罪主体
侵害客体
客观方面
substitute for examination crime
necessity
crime subject
object of infringement
objective aspect
