摘要
标准必要专利主要出现在通讯技术领域。按照国际上公认的原则,一方面,专利权人应当无歧视地发放许可,另一方面,标准必要专利的使用者应当支付合理的使用费用。在"华为公司与IDC公司"一案中,深圳市中级人民法院和广东省高级人民法院根据相关的因素,探讨了合理许可使用费的问题,具有广泛的国际影响力。然而,有关标准必要专利的"公平、合理、无歧视"属于合同领域的一项原则,应当更多地由当事人通过谈判达成协议,而非法院的介入。
Standard Essential Patents are mainly in the field of communication technology. On the principle of Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discrimination, the patent owners involved in the standard shall issue permissions to the users without discrimination, and the users shall pay reasonable royalty to the patent owners. In ＂Huawei v. IDC＂, Shenzhen Intermediate Court and Guangdong High Court discussed the issue of reasonable royalty on the basis of the elements related, and the decision has a broad international infl uence. However, FRAND is a principle in the contract law, meaning the deal shall be reached by the patent owners and the users involved. Thus the interference by a court shall be a rare case.
作者
李明德
LI Mingde(Institute of Law, CASS, Beijing 100720)
出处
《中国发明与专利》
2018年第6期105-107,共3页
China Invention & Patent
关键词
标准必要专利
公平合理无歧视
专利许可使用费
Standard Essential Patents
Fair
Reasonable
and Non-Discrimination
patent royalty
