摘要
2010年英国最高法院关于Dallah案之争虽然已经过去数年之久,但鉴于普通法之属性特征,其产生的各种影响却不容忽视。英国最高法院违背《纽约公约》有关效率与效力之立法精神,对法国国际仲裁院关于Dallah案的裁决承认与执行的裁定,不仅会在未来相当久长的时间内影响英联邦国家对《纽约公约》的执行力度,更会模糊其他国家关于《纽约公约》倾向于＂偏好＂对外国仲裁裁决支持的立法目的。而我国大陆部分学者对英国最高法院关于Dallah案之审理看法不同,观点迥异。有鉴于此,本文拟对Dallah案的推理进行再度分析,坚持认为英国最高法院此番裁定有悖国际仲裁今日之潮流,伤害了《纽约公约》之立法精神,因而值得重新商榷。
It has already been several years since the award of Dallah case had been rendered by the Supreme Court of UK and the Appellant Court of France.It＇s influence,nevertheless,should not be ignored due to the nature and character of the Common Law.English Supreme Court＇s final decision against the award made by French Arbitration Tribunal in Paris will not only have a strong negative influence on the validity and efficiency of New York Convention,but also on its reasonable and proper recognition and enforcement by other nations of Commonwealth.What＇s more,such a decision may give a bad blow on the Convention＇s spirit and orientation of pro-enforcement more misty.Also,some of the academics from China hold different viewpoints and their disputes may cause some adverse or unfavorable impact on the Arbitration innovation which is being on the way in China.This essay thus is intended to give a further analysis on the reasoning of Dallah case and the fundamental arguments from English and French courts and argues that it is the decision from the English Supreme Court that is against the legislative intent and the spirit of New York Convention and which deserves being further weighted and considered.
作者
孙宏友
曾仲皙
Sun Hongyou;Zeng Zhongxi
出处
《仲裁研究》
2017年第1期91-101,共11页
Arbitration Study
关键词
国际仲裁
纽约公约
Dallah案
仲裁地
司法管辖权
International Arbitration New York Convention Dallah Case Seat of ArbitrationJurisdiction
