摘要
《民法总则》将通谋虚伪表示规定在两个法条之中。第146条规定了双方当事人之间虚伪行为和隐藏行为的效力。同时第154条规定了当事人恶意串通并损害他人合法权益的民事法律行为的效力。虽然两者按主观意思不同被区分为不同法条,但其均间接阐释了通谋虚伪表示行为在当事人之间的效力。通谋虚伪表示在民事法律行为中的适用有其特定的法理依据和目的,但是,对于身份法律行为而言,能否直接进行不加区别地适用存在争议。近年来,随着社会开放程度的增加,虚假结婚行为逐渐登上了社会舞台,由此,一些伴随着虚假结婚行为的后果也相应产生。对此现象,适用通谋虚伪表示的一般规定还是根据个案和身份法律行为的特殊性进行区别对待,值得进一步讨论。
＂General Provisions of Civil Law＂ puts the hypocrisy into the provisions of two articles. Article 146 lays down the validity of the hypocrisy and the hidden behavior between the parties. At the same time, Article 154 sets forth the validity of the civil legal acts of the parties who maliciously collude and undermine the legitimate rights and interests of others. Although the two articles are divided into different laws based on different subjective meanings, both of them indirectly explain the effectiveness of the hypocrisy between the parties. It is hypocritical to say that the application of civil law acts has its own specific jurisprudential basis and purpose. However, it is controversial whether there is direct and indiscriminate application of identity legal acts. In recent years, as the degree of social openness increases, false marriage practices have gradually taken the social stage. As a result, some of the consequences accompanying the false marriage have also arisen. For this phenomenon, it is worth further discussing whether to apply the general provisions of the hypocrisy of the general public or to distinguish them according to the particularity of the legal acts of the individual.
作者
韩煦
HAN Xu(Law School, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 20004)
出处
《宁波广播电视大学学报》
2018年第1期91-95,共5页
Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University
