摘要
普遍论、相对论、语境论作为三大伦理理论流派,分别代表了不同的伦理思维,为教学提供了不同的伦理判断标准。在普遍论视域下,教学伦理标准就是教学中普遍的价值观念和规范;在相对论视域下,教学伦理标准是通过价值澄清和自主选择来确认的;在语境论视域下,教学伦理标准是在具体教学实践和实际境遇下的判断依据。用不同的标准去审视同一个教学问题,会让我们得出不同的结论。然而,三种标准既有其理论意义,也有自身无法超越的限度。教学伦理标准的选择需要一种视域的融合:既要遵循教学世界中普遍的"底线伦理",在"对话"与"商谈"过程中解决教学伦理冲突,也要从具体的语境出发消弭教学中的伦理困境。
As the three major schools of ethics theory,universalism,relativity and contextualism represent different ethical thought and provide a different standard of ethical judgment for teaching. In the view of universalism,the standard of teaching ethics is the universal values and norms in teaching. In the view of relativity,the standard of teaching ethics is confirmed by value clarification and independent selection. From the perspective of contextualism,the standard of teaching ethics is the judgment under the concrete teaching practice and actual situation. Using different standards to judge the same teaching problem will let us draw different conclusions. The three standards have their rationality and their own limits. Therefore,we need to integrate the standards of teaching ethics： to follow the universal＂rudimentary ethics＂in the teaching world,to solve the conflict of teaching ethics in the way of＂dialogue＂and＂negotiation＂and to eliminate the ethical dilemma in teaching from the perspective of context.
作者
穆建亚
MU Jianya1,2(1. College of Educational Science, Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang, Henan 473061, China ; 2. College of Educational Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha , Hunan 410081, Chin)
出处
《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期120-124,F0003,共6页
Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University
基金
湖南省教育科学规划重点课题"中小学教师隐性知识显性化的路径研究"[XJK013AJC003]
湖南省社会科学基金项目"大学教学改革的文化生态研究"[12JD47]
河南省教育科学规划重大招标课题"河南省数字教材建设标准及应用研究"(2018)[JKGHZDZB-05]
关键词
教学伦理
判断标准
普遍论
相对论
语境论
teaching ethics
standard
universalism
relativity
contextualism
