期刊文献+

灾后重建与基层治理模式的变迁:对5·12汶川地震灾后重建中L镇的比较研究 被引量:5

Post-Disaster Reconstruction and the Changes of Local Governance Model:A Comparative Study of Post-Disaster Reconstruction of the 5·12 Wenchuan Earthquake in L Town
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在5·12地震三年的灾后重建过程中,政府通过强化对基层政权的控制,使得权威主义治理模式成为重要的灾害应对机制。与此同时,社会组织的介入成为5·12地震灾后社区重建的新的社会参与形式。通过持续三年对四川省龙门山镇A社区和B社区重建的比较研究,发现在社区治理层面,无论社会组织的参与式治理还是村集体的权威主义治理都有自己的优势,但又处于超越社区层面的急速的灾后重建过程、城乡一体化过程以及社会管理改革过程的交互作用中。各种力量对社区的多方面介入使得基于相对隔离封闭的传统社区的参与式发展理论和以往计划体制下的单一权威治理思路都难以应对。社会治理制度需要在党的领导下,在多元共治和权威管控之间达到平衡。 In the three-year post-disaster reconstruction of the 5·12 earthquake, the government make the authoritarian governance as an important mechanism for disaster response by strengthening the control of the local political power. At the same time, the involvement of social organizations has become a new form of social participation in the community reconstruction after the earthquake. Based on the three-year participation and comparative study of two communities in Longmenshan town of Sichuan province, the research tries to point out that both the participatory governance of social organizations and the authoritative governance of the village collectives have their own advantages in community governance. However, they coexist in the processes of post-disaster reconstruction, urban-rural integration and social management reform, which is beyond community-level. The involvement of various subjects in the community has made it difficult to respond depending solely on the participatory development theory, which is based on the relatively isolated traditional communities and the single authoritative governance ideas under the previous planning system. The social governance system needs to achieve balance under the leadership of CPC and between multi-dimensional co-governance and authoritative governance.
作者 景燕春 朱健刚 JING Yan-chun;ZHU Jian-gang
出处 《理论与改革》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第3期38-48,共11页 Theory and Reform
基金 国家社科基金重大招标项目"我国城市社区建设的方向与重点研究:基于治理的视角"(编号:15ZDA046)
关键词 灾难 灾后重建 参与式治理 权威治理 Disaster Post--disaster reconstruction Participatory governance Authoritarian governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献55

  • 1许经勇.解决“三农”问题的两种互补模型:外生性发展与内生性发展[J].北京行政学院学报,2007(4):50-53. 被引量:6
  • 2参见周大鸣编著:《现代都市人类学》,中山大学出版社1996年版. 被引量:1
  • 3弗朗兹·博厄斯.《人类学与现代生活》,刘莎等译.华夏出版社,1999年版,第78页. 被引量:5
  • 4Adams,W. M. 1995, "Green Development Theory? Environmentalism and Sustainable Development. " In Jonathan Crush ( ed. ) Power of Development. London: Routledge. 被引量:1
  • 5Apffel-Marglin, Frederique 1990, "Technology and the Reproduction of Values in Rural Westem India. " In Frederique Apffel - Marglin & Stephen A. Marglin (eds.) Dominating Knowledge: Development, Culture and Resistance. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 被引量:1
  • 6Chambers, R. 1983, Rural Development: Putting the Last First.London: Longman. 被引量:1
  • 7Chambers, R.1995, "Paradigm Shifts and the Practice of Participatory Research and Development." in Nici Nelson & Susan Wright (eds.) Power and Participatory Development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications. 被引量:1
  • 8Chambers, R. 1997, Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications. 被引量:1
  • 9Crewe, E. & E. Harrison 1989, Whose Development? An Etlmography of Aid. London & New York: Zed Book. 被引量:1
  • 10Crush, J. 1995, "Imaging Development. " In Jonathan Crush (ed.) Power of Development. London: Routledge. 被引量:1

同被引文献79

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部