摘要
目的比较阴道后壁桥垫式缝合术与传统修补术治疗阴道壁膨出的临床效果。方法选择我院2008年8月至2016年9月收治的阴道壁膨出患者82例,根据不同治疗方法分为桥垫式缝合术组(42例,采用阴道后壁桥垫式缝合术)与传统修补术组(40例,采用传统修补术)。观测并对比两组患者的临床指标。结果桥垫式缝合术组患者的术中出血量少于传统修补术组,手术时间、住院天数均短于传统修补术组(P<0.05);两组并发症发生率与复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论桥垫式缝合术治疗阴道壁膨出可缩短患者的手术时间与住院天数,减少术中出血量,是一种安全、高效的手术方法。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of vaginal posterior wall bridge cushion suture and traditional repair on vaginal wall bulging. Methods A total of 82 cases of patients with vaginal prolapse admitted in our hospital were selected and divided into bridge cushion suture group（42 cases, treated with vaginal posterior wall bridge cushion suture）and traditional repair group（40 cases, treated with traditional repair） according to the different treatment methods. The clinical indicators were compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss in the bridge cushion suture group was less than that of the traditional repair group, the operation time and hospitalization time were shorter than those of the traditional repair group（P〈0.05）. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidences of complications and recurrence rates between the two groups（P〉0.05）. Conclusion The vaginal posterior wall bridge cushion suture has significant effect in the treatment of the vaginal wall bulging, which is safe and efficient.
作者
姜家英
JIANG Jia-ying(Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ankang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ankang 725000, Chin)
出处
《临床医学研究与实践》
2018年第12期95-96,共2页
Clinical Research and Practice
关键词
阴道壁膨出
阴道后壁桥垫式缝合术
传统修补术
vaginal wall bulging
vaginal posterior wall bridge cushion suture
traditional repair
