摘要
移动支付的普及带来了社会生活的快捷与便利,但也同时使得侵犯财产的犯罪形式花样翻新。实践中,对于更换商家二维码而取得他人财产的行为应给予怎样的刑法评价不无争议,主要集中在盗窃罪与诈骗罪之构成要件符合性的问题上。从财产犯罪的认定思路入手,以盗窃与诈骗二者的不法类型区分为依据,并结合民法"权利外观责任"原理,应将顾客认定为被骗人,商家认定为被害人,其损失的并非是有体财物,而是一种财产性利益,因此该行为不符合以"转移占有"为核心特征的盗窃罪之构成。相反,更换二维码取财的行为应以诈骗罪(三角诈骗)论处,这一结论不仅维护了"被害人处分财产"的构成要件定型,且满足了"素材同一性"的要求。
The popularity of mobile payments brings social life fast and convenient, but also makes the retrofit forms of crime against property. In practice, one for businesses and obtain the two-dimensional code of the property of others behavior should be given criminal evaluation of what is controversial, mainly concentrated in the crime of theft and fraud of the elements of compliance issues. Starting from the idea that the property crime by illegal type of theft and fraud of the two division as the basis, combined with the principle of ＂right appearance responsibility＂ in civil law ,the customer should be identified as being deceptive, businesses identified as victims, the loss of the object is not a body of property, but the property interests. So the act does not conform to the crime of ＂transfer possession＂ as the core of the theft. On the contrary, the replacement of two-dimensional code to take the money of the behavior of fraud should be punished （ triangle fraud） , this conclusion is not only to maintain the ＂elements of the victim property setting＂, and ＂meet the same material requirements＂.
作者
孙杰
Sun Jie(Criminal Justice School of Shandong University of Political Science and Law,Jinan Shandong 250014)
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期120-130,共11页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
2017年山东省法学会项目"新型支付环境下财产犯罪的认定思路"(SLS2017C78)阶段性成果
山东政法学院职务犯罪侦查理论研究中心2018年度成果
关键词
二维码
财产性利益
盗窃罪
诈骗罪
two-dimensional code
property interests
theft
fraud
