摘要
像费耶阿本德等后逻辑实证主义者一样,纽拉特在对波普证伪主义的批评中反对科学有单一的方法。纽拉特对实在论问题的讨论亦构成了对波普基于证伪主义的形而上学实在论的批评。尽管如此,文章论证了纽拉特的基于科学实践的正面的、语境主义的哲学中仍然存在规范性的资源回答科学合理性问题,从而避免相对主义。纽拉特用以取代形而上学实在论的,则是他的"在科学中讨论实在"的自然化的实在论。
Neurath argued against that there was a single method in science in his critique on Popper like Feyer-abend. Neurath also made a critique on Popper＇ s metaphysical realism. Nevertheless, this paper argues that thereare normative resources in Neurath＇ s philosophy, which is contextualized and based on science practice, to answerthe question of scientific rationality. Neurath did not fall into relativism. Also, the paper argues that Neurath estab-lished a naturalized approach to scientific realism in order to eliminate Popper＇ s metaphysical realism.
作者
陈泓邑
CHEN Hong - yi(School of Philosophy, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, Chin)
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期40-44,共5页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
