期刊文献+

通风卷烟2种不同打孔方式的比较 被引量:4

Comparison of two different drilling methods for ventilated cigarettes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为系统评价通风卷烟2种不同打孔方式对卷烟质量和生产成本的影响,分别从卷烟理化指标、感官质量、技术优势和综合成本4个方面展开详细的比较分析。结果表明:2种打孔方式下的卷烟物理指标、烟气指标、感官质量无显著差异;较之预打孔生产方式,在线打孔生产的烟支通风率符合性和稳定性更好;采用在线打孔,能缩短新产品研发周期,减少滤棒规格数量,降低接装纸和滤棒等采购成本。 In order to systematically evaluate the influence of two different drilling methods to ventilated cigarette quality and production cost, 4 aspects of ventilated cigarette including cigarette physical and chemical indexes, sensory quality, technical superiority and composite cost are comparatively analyzed. Results show that: there are no significant differences of physical and chemical indexes, smoke index, sensory quality between pre-drilling and on-line drilling; compared with the pre-drilling method, the ventilation rate and stability of the cigarettes produced by online drilling are better; using online drilling will cost less time of new product development, meanwhile it can reduce the varieties and quantity of filter rods, the cost of receiving paper and filter rods and other procurement costs.
出处 《湖南文理学院学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2018年第1期53-56,共4页 Journal of Hunan University of Arts and Science(Science and Technology)
基金 安徽中烟工业有限责任公司科技项目(2016123)
关键词 卷烟通风 预打孔 在线打孔 卷烟质量 生产成本 cigarette ventilation pre-drilling on-line drilling cigarette quality production cost
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献60

共引文献66

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部