摘要
目的 :探讨血液透析 (HD)与持续性非卧床腹膜透析 (CAPD)在糖尿病肾病 (DN)尿毒症患者治疗中的优缺点。方法 :回顾性分析了 1 0 9例接受透析的糖尿病肾病尿毒症患者 ,其中 61例进行CAPD治疗 ,48例进行HD治疗 ,对比两组患者的生存率、主要并发症、死因。结果 :透析前合并有全身小动脉硬化、心血管疾患、视网膜改变或年龄 >60岁者 ,行CAPD治疗并发症减少 ,生活质量提高。结论 :糖尿病肾病患者合并有全身小动脉硬化、心血管不稳定、视网膜病变或年龄 >
AIM: To compare the advantages and disadvantages between hemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy with uremia. METHODS: The survival rate, main complications, and the cause of death were compared between 61 cases of diabetic nephropathy with uremia received CAPD and 48 cases received HD. RESULTS: The patients with cardiovascular disease, and retinopathy, or age >70 years before dialysis, treated by CAPD, had less complications and higher life quality in comparison with HD. CONCLUSIONS: CAPD is suitable for the patients of diabetic nephropathy with uremia, system arteriosclerosis, cardiovascular instability, and retinopathy, or age >60 years.
出处
《中国临床药理学与治疗学》
CAS
CSCD
2002年第4期331-333,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
关键词
糖尿病肾病
尿毒症
血液透析
腹膜透析
hemodialysis
peritoneal dialysis
diabetic nephropathy with uremia
