摘要
我国《民法总则》中关注了救助人和受益人因见义勇为行为而受损时责任如何承担的问题,但是并未提及无辜第三人因见义勇为行为而受损情况下的责任承担,这一立法空白也导致现实案例中情与法的冲突。我国的无因管理和紧急避险制度均不能妥善解决这一问题,法国民法中的默示合同制度和意大利民法中赋予法官的自由裁量权未来值得我国立法的借鉴。
The Civil Code in China has given resolutions to damages of both the rescuer and the recipient in a good Samaritan act,however damages of an innocent third party was not considered,which has lead to practical problems.Neither the system of negotiorum gestio nor the system of necessity can solve the problem properly.The theory of implied contract in French civil law and the judge's discretion in Italian civil law may give a useful reference to the future legislation.
出处
《齐鲁学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期80-83,共4页
Qilu Journal
关键词
见义勇为
无辜第三人
损害赔偿
good Samaritan acts
innocent third party
restitution
