摘要
当前,理论界对《合同法》第286条之权利尚未达成共识。为了探求该权利之属性,采用比较分析法,从立法和实际权利构成角度进行分析,得出该权利实际属于承揽人抵押权的结论。同时对承揽人抵押权设立角度和受偿次序进行分析,指出承揽人抵押权优先性的地位是因为承揽人实施的承揽事务属于费用性抵押权,既非留置权,也非优先权。
At present,theorists have not reached a consensus on the rights of the the No.286 article of Contract Law.In order to explore the nature of the right,by adopting comparative analysis,this article is analyzed from legislation and constitution of actual rights angle,and it is concluded that the right belongs to mechanic' s lien.Meanwhile,the establishment of mortgage right and the order of repayment of contractor are analyzed,and it is pointed out that the mortgage of contractor has priority position because the right belongs to the expense lien,neither lien in the law of real right nor theoretical priority.
出处
《北京邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》
2018年第1期33-42,共10页
Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
北京邮电大学世纪学院科研经费资助项目(CCBUPTKY201412)
