期刊文献+

民事判决书不能电子送达置疑 被引量:3

Doubts to the Practice of Non-electronic Delivery of Civil Judgment Paper
下载PDF
导出
摘要 判决书电子送达是否应该根据《民事诉讼法》第87条的规定而被排除在外,我国理论界质疑不断。从比较法视角来看,鲜有国家承认判决书适用电子送达。从我国法律现有规定分析,判决书电子送达与公告送达以及其他法律文书电子送达又有冲突之处,这些都是值得研究的地方。毋庸置疑,全面推行电子送达将成为我国民事诉讼送达制度的发展趋势。 There are different ideas, in Chinese academic circle, about whether the civil judgment paper can be delivered through electronic instruments which is excluded by 87th clause in "Civil Procedure Act". From the perspective of comparative law,it is rarely agreed that the judgment paper can be delivered electronically. If it is analyzed with current Chinese laws,there is contradiction of the electronie way for judgment paper, public announcement and other legal papers delivery,which is worth studying. It is unquestionable that a comprehensive employment of electronic delivery will be the trend for the development of civil action in China.
作者 李梦晴
机构地区 安徽大学法学院
出处 《哈尔滨学院学报》 2018年第1期76-79,共4页 Journal of Harbin University
关键词 民事判决书 电子送达 司法实践 信息化 civil judgment paper electronic way of delivery judicial practice to informationize
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献42

共引文献73

同被引文献13

二级引证文献4

;
使用帮助 返回顶部