摘要
目的：观察改良后浮针结合电针缓解顽固性颈痛的疗效。方法 ：将113例顽固性颈痛患者随机分为治疗组57例和对照组56例,治疗组使用改良后的浮针进行扫散手法后接电针,治疗结束不留置软管,对照组采用浮针常规扫散手法后留置软管24 h,均治疗10次后观察疗效并进行比较。结果 ：治疗组痊愈率42.11%,总有效率87.72%;对照组痊愈率23.21%,总有效率82.14%;两组痊愈率比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分和Northwick Park颈痛量表（NPQ）评分,两组治疗前后组内比较差异均有显著统计学意义（P〈0.01）;治疗后两组间比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：浮电针不但疗效优于浮针,而且可以避免潜在医疗风险的发生。
Objective：To observe the efficacy of modified superficial electroacupuncture on relieving intractable neck pain. Method：There were 113 patients with intractable neck pain randomly which were divided into the treatment group（57 cases） and control group（56 cases）. The treatment group was treated with sweeping-dispersing manipulation based on modified superficial needling and followed by electroacupuncture,without retention of the soft tube after treatment. The control group was treated with dispersing manipulation and followed by 24 h retention of the soft tube. The curative effect was evaluated and compared after 10 times of treatment. Result：The cure rate and the total effective rate in the treatment group were 42.11% and87.72%,respectively,while the cure rate and the total effective rate in control group were 23.21% and82.14%,respectively. There was a statistically significant difference of the cure rate between the two groups（P0.05）. On the scores of visual analogue scale（VAS） and Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire（NPQ）,there was significant statistical difference between before and after treatment in the two groups（P0.05）,and after treatment there was significant differences between the two groups（P0.05）. Conclusion：The efficacy of the modified superficial electroacupuncture is better than that of superficial needling. Also,the modified superficial electroacupuncture could avoid potential medical risks.
出处
《山东中医杂志》
2018年第2期126-128,共3页
Shandong Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
上海市卫计委中医药科研项目(编号:2014LP026B)
关键词
改良浮电针
颈痛
颈型颈椎病
modified superficial electroacupuncture
neck pain
cervical spondylosis
