摘要
作为企业获取外部知识资源的重要途径,高技术服务业对于提升工业企业创新潜能的重要性,一直被政府政策和现有研究所强调与关注。然而高技术服务业与企业内部研发在促进工业企业创新中的关系却未有专门研究。本文从多维度视角切入,理论分析了两者之间的互补促进和替代挤出关系,并与企业投资行为模型相结合,考察了高技术服务业对工业企业内部研发的影响。基于中国企业数据的实证研究表明,高技术服务业与企业内部研发在促进工业企业创新过程中呈现显著的替代关系,工业企业仍以内部研发作为主要创新途径。而无论是国际比较还是与工业企业研发的创新回报率对比,均揭示出我国高技术服务业高投入、低生产率、低回报率的现实特征,这无疑是导致上述实证结果的重要原因。进一步研究显示,在高技术服务业发展水平较高的地区,它与企业内部研发的关系出现了由替代向互补转变的端倪。最后本文就如何最大化实现高技术服务业与企业内部研发的协同创新效应,以及两者间的互动互补关系,提出政策建议。
As an important way to obtain external knowledge resources, the role of high-tech service industries in promoting manufacturing firms？ innovation has been emphasized by the government policy. However, the relation between high-tech service industries and manufacturing firms？ internal RD has not been researched. This paper theoretically and empirically investigates the impact of high-tech service industries on manufacturing firms？ innovation. Firstly, we analyze the development trend of Chinese high-tech service industries and compare them with OECD countries. We find out that China has experienced a rapid expansion of the high-tech service industries. However, there is still room for China to grow and compete globally in the industries. Secondly, we propose a theoretical framework to analyze the relationship between high-tech service industries and manufacturing firms？ innovation. We want to find out whether these two factors are complementary or substitutive for each other. By drawing on the resource-based view and transaction costs theory, this study shows that high-tech service industries can enhance manufacturing firms？ innovation as well as substitute for, or actually ？？crowd-out？？ manufacturing firms？ RD investment. We also use the firm？s investment behavior model to theoretically examine the mechanisms through which high-tech service industries can impact manufacturing firms？ innovation. Thirdly, this paper uses the negative binomial regression model based on a knowledge production function to empirically examine the relationship between high-tech service industries and manufacturing firms？ innovation in China. Based on Chinese firms？ data, the empirical evidence shows that high-tech service industries substitute for and tend to ？？crowd out？？ manufacturing firms？ innovation. Chinese manufacturing firms still innovate by themselves. We also analyze the reasons behind of this finding. This is due to the low investment, low productivity and low return of Chinese high-tech
出处
《管理工程学报》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2018年第1期41-50,共10页
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71403102)
国家自然科学基金资助重点项目(71333007)
广东省自然科学基金资助项目(2014A030313371)
关键词
高技术服务业
工业企业创新
内部研发
互补替代
挤出效应
high-tech service industries
manufacturing firm innovation
internal R＆D
substitution and complementary
crowding-out Effect
