期刊文献+

对比分析不同手术治疗方式治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果 被引量:2

Comparison and Analysis of the Clinical Effect of Different Surgical Treatment for Inguinal Hernia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析腹股沟疝采用不同手术治疗方式治疗的有效性。方法选择82例2016年1月—2017年9月收治的腹股沟疝患者,分为两组,对照组给予传统疝修补术治疗,研究组实施无张力疝修补术治疗,观察两组治疗效果。结果研究组手术时间与住院时间分别为(42.3±7.2)min和(4.9±1.5)天,均少于对照组(P<0.05),研究组术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组并发症发生率为4.76%,对照组发生率为22.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹股沟疝患者应用无张力疝修补术治疗的临床效果显著。 Objective To analyze the effectiveness of different surgical treatments for inguinal hernia. Methods 82 cases of inguinal hernia treated from January 2016 to September 2017 were selected and divided into two groups. The control group was treated with traditional herniorrhaphy, and the study group was treated with tension-free herniorrhaphy, and the effect of two groups was observed. Results In the study group, the operation time and the time of hospitalization were (42.3±7.2) min and (4.9±1.5) days, respectively, and were less than the control group (P 〈 0.05). The amount of bleeding in the study group was less than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). The incidence of complications in the study group was 4.76%, and the rate in the control group was 22.5%, and the difference was statistically signifcant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of tension-free herniorrhaphy for inguinal hernia patients is signifcant.
作者 刘连宝
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2018年第7期98-100,共3页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 手术治疗 无张力疝修补术 腹股沟疝 临床效果 surgical treatment tension-free herniorrhaphy inguinal hernia clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献123

  • 1周世勇,李忠礼,刘卓志,郑乃国,阮明.赫美疝平片在开放式腹膜前无张力疝修补术中的临床应用体会[J].黑龙江医学,2013,37(10):941-942. 被引量:4
  • 2中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组.成人腹股沟疝、股疝和腹部手术切口疝手术治疗方案(2003年修订稿)[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(14):834-835. 被引量:630
  • 3吴在德 吴肇汉.外科学[M]6版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.267-268. 被引量:325
  • 4Read RC. Herniology : past, present, and future [ J ]. Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery,2009,13 (6) :577-580. 被引量:1
  • 5Pavol K, Peter F. Innovation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repara- tion-Initial Experiences with the Parietex Progrip LaparoscopicTM-Mesh [ J]. Front Surg,2015,2:28. 被引量:1
  • 6Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenacker T, et al. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hemia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J]. Hernia,2014,18(2) :151-163. 被引量:1
  • 7Oribabor FO, Amao OA, Akanni SO, et al. The use of nontreated mos- quito-net mesh cloth for a tension free inguinal hemia repair:our expe- rience[ J]. Niger J Surg,2015,21 ( 1 ) :48-51. 被引量:1
  • 8Jeroukhimov I, Wiser I, Karasic E, et al. Reduced postoperative chronicpain after tension-free inguinal hernia repair using absorbable sutures : a single-blind randomized clinical trial[ J]. J Am Coil Surg,2014,218 ( 1 ) : 102-107. 被引量:1
  • 9Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, et al. Guidelines for laparescopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [ Interna- tional Endohemia Society (IEHS) ] [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2011,25 ( 9 ) : 2773-2843. 被引量:1
  • 10Kukleta JF, Freytag C, Weber M. Efficiency and safety of mesh fixation in laparescopic inguinal hernia repair using u-butyl eyanoacrylate: long-term biocompatibility in over 1,300 mesh fixations [ J ]. Hernia, 2012,16(2) :153-162. 被引量:1

共引文献232

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部